I call that following the same successful recipe that got us the Falcon 9.

The mindset that considers those tests failures is the same one that would still be in bureaucracy hell determining what 40 year old technology we should repurpose to get a future over budget, late, and under performing solution designed and built.

How do you think they just skipped the parts where they would state the actual alleged crimes? They in fact didn't skip that part.

Or that didn't happen and you think it did because you listen to and believe lying liars who lie.

Boot the laptop from a USB memory stick that has a Linux installer on it.

They didn't mean the backdoor was (or was not) an accident. They meant the backdoor was implemented sloppily enough to be discovered and maybe that was not an accident (as in, he wanted it to be found, but still wanted to plausibly be seen as trying his best to keep those coercing him appeased)

You're comparing a 25 year old vehicle with a new one. Come back in 25 years and do a similar comparison with a 2024 30k EV... Or, accept that your argument has nothing to do with EVs and is just an argument against buying new.

I think everyone always gets the direction right the first time. That's why, when it won't go in, and you rotate it 180, it still won't go in and you have to flip it back to the original direction to finally get it in.

Why not both

My guess is you were burned more than shocked.

You seem to be doing the same duality thing: "If you are against Trump, you must be pro Biden and that is just as bad!"

No but it can definitely work around issues like a congested link between isp and Google, resolving network-related YouTube performance issues.

Please take a moment:

They're - they are (the ' replaces the space and the a)

Their - belongs to them

There - not here