[-] greengnu@slrpnk.net 3 points 2 weeks ago

a search engine for the gemini network protocol

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Gemini_(protocol)

13
Renewed drives (slrpnk.net)
submitted 2 weeks ago by greengnu@slrpnk.net to c/datahoarder@lemmy.ml

Are they worth considering or only worth it at certain price points?

[-] greengnu@slrpnk.net 3 points 1 month ago

have 2 flash/hard/whatever drives: A and B

once a month (or at what ever frequency you can sustain)

backup your data to A and next cycle backup your data to B

nothing fancy or technical, just some basic consistent backups.

if you can do that you'll likely be fine. There are nearly infinitely many enhancements you can do if you are more technical or can follow technical instructions.

[-] greengnu@slrpnk.net 13 points 1 month ago

That is just the gateway drug to bootstrapping.

Check out https://github.com/fosslinux/live-bootstrap

if you want the real hard stuff.

[-] greengnu@slrpnk.net 14 points 4 months ago

They already did: https://www.commanderx16.com/

you just probably want something better.

and that is the problem building higher performance requires more advanced lithography and that is expensive and until recently was not even an option for a hobbyist (without taking a mortgage on their house).

Given current stagnation, you need only wait about 10 years for that viable option.

[-] greengnu@slrpnk.net 7 points 5 months ago

rxvt-unicode with tabbedex.

I refuse to use a terminal emulator that needs more than 100MB of RAM to display 80x24 green text on a black display

1

When you have a database with 6 Billion dollars (US) flowing through it every year, you need to be able to account and prove exactly every single penny and every single action that occurred. So you better have _A tables for all of the main tables and have these columns to boot.

  1. Create_user_id – Who/what created the record
  2. Create_Dt – When exactly was this record created
  3. Update_user_id – If updated, who updated this record (default null)
  4. Update_Dt – when was it last updated (default null)
  5. Archive_Dt – When can we legally destroy these records
  6. Unique_Trans_id – So that tracing down everything that occurred becomes even easier.

It isn't sexy but it'll be handy if you ever need to trace down things in your database too.

1

Knowing when a record can be disposed of in the future is deeply valuable to keeping database tables clean and containing only useful data.

31-DEC-2999 is pretty common for records that don't have an easily known value.

If you are in an organization that is trying to monetize your data, treat this value as the date when the user will no longer be able to see this record.

If you are in a more sane industry, treat it as the records retention date minus X number of days that match your _A table storage duration or if the record is already in your _A table, the date it will be deleted and no longer recoverable.

You may wish to put some thought to your database backup and rotation schedule so that those records cleared by that date as well but I leave that as an exercise to the reader.

1

There are 2 ways of doing reference tables:

unique hand written tables that perfectly match your desired data

or

The RT_ tables pattern mixed with cached views which will give a useful versioned reference table with an effective begin date, meaningful descriptions, version number, the effective end date (If it is set). With the ability to get previous version values if needed, who created the values, when the values were created, who updated the values and when they were updated (And if you follow _A table best practices, all of the previous updates too); not that you would likely need to update the values without doing a version update as well.

Insert in the following order to avoid constraint violations:

RT_TABLE

RT_FIELD_DOMAIN (only need to add entries when creating new reference table views or adding columns to reference tables)

RT_TABLE_FIELD (duplicate old RT_FIELD_DOMAIN values with new table to keep old column names)

RT_FIELD_VALUES (Easiest to do 1 row or column at a time)

Or just insert them all in a single transaction

RT_TABLE design

This is the master reference table for finding what reference tables exist and the versions that exist for them.

| Name            | Null     | Type           |
|-----------------+----------+----------------|
| REF_TABLE_ID    | NOT NULL | NUMBER         |
| TABLE_ID        |          | NUMBER         |
| VERSION         |          | NUMBER         |
| NAME            |          | VARCHAR2(30)   |
| DESCRIPTION     |          | VARCHAR2(255)  |
| COMMENTS        |          | VARCHAR2(255)  |
| STATUS          |          | CHAR(1)        |
| CREATE_USER_ID  | NOT NULL | VARCHAR2(20)   |
| UPDATE_USER_ID  |          | VARCHAR2(20)   |
| CREATE_DT       | NOT NULL | DATE           |
| UPDATE_DT       |          | DATE           |
| UNIQUE_TRANS_ID | NOT NULL | NUMBER         |
| EFF_BEGIN_DT    | NOT NULL | DATE           |
| EFF_END_DT      |          | DATE           |
| ARCHIVE_DT      | NOT NULL | DATE           | 

REF_TABLE_ID is the primary key

RT_FIELD_VALUES design

The actual reference table values

| Name               | Null     | Type          |
|--------------------+----------+---------------|
| REF_TABLE_FIELD_ID | NOT NULL | NUMBER        |
| FIELD_ROW_ID       | NOT NULL | NUMBER        |
| FIELD_VALUE        |          | VARCHAR2(255) |
| CREATE_USER_ID     | NOT NULL | VARCHAR2(20)  |
| UPDATE_USER_ID     |          | VARCHAR2(20)  |
| CREATE_DT          | NOT NULL | DATE          |
| UPDATE_DT          |          | DATE          |
| UNIQUE_TRANS_ID    | NOT NULL | NUMBER        |
| ARCHIVE_DT         | NOT NULL | DATE          |

REF_TABLE_FIELD_ID has a foreign key with RT_TABLE_FIELD.REF_TABLE_FIELD_ID FIELD_ROW_ID a sequence value used for all entries on a row

RT_TABLE_FIELD design

This is the glue table for all of the reference tables

| Name               | Null     | Type          |
|--------------------+----------+---------------|
| REF_TABLE_FIELD_ID | NOT NULL | NUMBER        |
| REF_TABLE_ID       | NOT NULL | NUMBER        |
| FIELD_ID           | NOT NULL | NUMBER        |
| CREATE_USER_ID     | NOT NULL | VARCHAR2(20)  |
| UPDATE_USER_ID     |          | VARCHAR2(20)  |
| CREATE_DT          | NOT NULL | DATE          |
| UPDATE_DT          |          | DATE          |
| UNIQUE_TRANS_ID    | NOT NULL | NUMBER        |
| ARCHIVE_DT         | NOT NULL | DATE          |

REF_TABLE_FIELD_ID is the primary key (sequence or uuid) REF_TABLE_ID is a foreign key to RT_TABLE.REF_TABLE_ID FIELD_ID is a foreign key to RT_FIELD_DOMAIN.FIELD_ID

RT_FIELD_DOMAIN design

The actual column names for the reference tables

| Name            | Null     | Type          |
|-----------------+----------+---------------|
| FIELD_ID        | NOT NULL | NUMBER        |
| NAME            |          | VARCHAR2(50)  |
| DATA_TYPE       |          | CHAR(1)       |
| MAX_LENGTH      |          | NUMBER(5)     |
| NULLS_ALLOWED   |          | CHAR(1)       |
| CREATE_USER_ID  | NOT NULL | VARCHAR2(20)  |
| UPDATE_USER_ID  |          | VARCHAR2(20)  |
| CREATE_DT       | NOT NULL | DATE          |
| UPDATE_DT       |          | DATE          |
| UNIQUE_TRANS_ID | NOT NULL | NUMBER        |
| ARCHIVE_DT      | NOT NULL | DATE          |

FIELD_ID is the primary key (sequence or uuid)

RT_ALL_MV design

The master query behind all of the reference tables (keep it cached)

CREATE VIEW IF NOT EXISTS RT_ALL_MV AS
SELECT
   A.NAME AS TABLENAME
  ,A.VERSION AS VERSION
  ,D.FIELD_ID AS FIELDID
  ,A.EFF_BEGIN_DT AS EFFBEGDATE
  ,A.EFF_END_DT AS EFFENDDATE
  ,B.FIELD_ROW_ID AS ROW_ID
  ,D.NAME AS COLUMNNAME
  ,B.FIELD_VALUE AS COLUMNVALUE
FROM
   RT_TABLE A
  ,RT_FIELD_VALUES B
  ,RT_TABLE_FIELD C
  ,RT_FIELD_DOMAIN D
WHERE
  A.REF_TABLE_ID = C.REF_TABLE_ID                AND
  B.REF_TABLE_FIELD_ID = C.REF_TABLE_FIELD_ID    AND
  C.FIELD_ID = D.FIELD_ID;

Example RT_ view

Current values can be just: SELECT * FROM RT_example_MV; For figuring out previous values or making a view:

For sqls that support DECODE

SELECT
   MAX(DECODE(COLUMNNAME, 'CODE', COLUMNVALUE)) AS CODE
  ,MAX(DECODE(COLUMNNAME, 'DESCRIPTION', COLUMNVALUE)) AS DESCRIPTION
  ,MAX(VERSION) AS VERSION
  ,MAX(EFFBEGDATE) AS EFF_BEGIN_DT
  ,MAX(EFFENDDATE) AS EFF_END_DT
FROM FROM RT_ALL_MV
WHERE
  TABLENAME LIKE '%STATUS_IND%' AND VERSION=3
GROUP BY ROW_ID
ORDER BY CODE;

For sqls without

SELECT
   MAX(CASE COLUMNNAME WHEN 'Code' THEN COLUMNVALUE END) AS 'Code'
  ,MAX(CASE COLUMNNAME WHEN 'S0_Rate' THEN COLUMNVALUE END) AS 'S0 Rate'
  ,MAX(CASE COLUMNNAME WHEN 'S1_Rate' THEN COLUMNVALUE END) AS 'S1 Rate'
  ,MAX(VERSION) AS VERSION
  ,MAX(EFFBEGDATE) AS EFF_BEGIN_DT
  ,MAX(EFFENDDATE) AS EFF_END_DT
FROM RT_ALL_MV
WHERE
  TABLENAME LIKE '%example%' AND VERSION=1
GROUP BY ROW_ID
ORDER BY CODE;
1

The HIST_NAV_IND column:

When you want a history of values (such as ratings) in the main table for some business requirement, add this column and use the following values:

S => When you have only 1 record

F => The first record when you have more than 1 record

P => The current primary record when you have more than 1

M => The previous P records that have been surpassed.

The EFF_BEGIN_DT and EFF_END_DT columns:

In case you might need to do reprocessing of old records you will want an easy way to figure out which rate history that you would want to use; EFF_BEGIN_DT and EFF_END_DT make that simple.

EFF_BEGIN_DT is always set in every record (generally it should match the create date but there are business reasons why you want it separate)

EFF_END_DT should be NULL for the current primary record (unless you are organized enough to always know the future rate change date in advance [unlikely]) and should always be set for the M and F records to the day [or hour, minute or second] prior to the EFF_BEGIN_DT of the new P record. The EFF_END_DT of one record should never overlap with the EFF_BEGIN_DT of the next and you can use TRUNC("TimeStamp", DATE) to ensure that your select driver will always either get 1 [normally] or zero [They shouldn't have been included] records.

1

You will find 2 different implementations for this, the first (very wrong) is a unique sequence for every table and it serves the purpose of a HIST_SEQ column.

The second (correct) is a global sequence which will be the same for all records in all tables which are updated by a single transaction. The purpose is to make it trivial to find all records (inserted, updated [ and deleted if using _A tables]) in a single transaction. [You'll want to add an AUDIT_UNIQUE_TRANS_ID column to your _A tables for that linkage]

In simple environments this can be just a simple sequence and in more advanced environments this can be a UUID. The key is it must be unique on every transaction but its value should not be used to provide any information about the order of events in a table (that is the job of a HISTORY_SEQ column).

1

If you might need to store multiple duplicate records or want a sequence number for the order of created/updated records in your table.

This is what you need, the big annoying bit is you need to also update this column on EVERY SINGLE UPDATE to that table and you'll want _A tables if you want to figure out historical ordering of events. And you will be creating a unique sequence for every single table where this column exists. but just shove that functionality in a trigger.

This also would be quite handy if you want a unique key handle for picking which records are being manually deleted and you have the solution when one person updates a record at the same time someone else is trying to delete a record.

[-] greengnu@slrpnk.net 3 points 9 months ago

Well the first question is what software you NEED to run, then we can figure out hardware.

1
submitted 10 months ago by greengnu@slrpnk.net to c/dataengineering@lemm.ee

Sometimes called journal or audit tables. _A tables do the following magic trick: you can't screw up or delete your data in a way you can't recover.

In the most simple version possible you take your table foo, duplicate it's structure in a table named foo_A and add 2 columns: audit_dt and audit_user_id. Then you create triggers for update and deletes on the table foo to first write the old values as a new insert in the foo_A table.

Now even if you screw up your select and delete all of the contents of table foo. everything will still be in table foo_A. If you accidentally overwrite everything in foo with garbage data, the good data will still be in foo_A

The application nor any of the users need to know about the _A tables (unless you want to leverage stored procedures instead of triggers to create the _A table entries)

1

with features down to 7 microns

1

Short version, it is slow and potentially more expensive than hiring professionals

[-] greengnu@slrpnk.net 5 points 10 months ago

Depends on what you mean by a huge problem.

If you are referring to energy loses due to the large distances and the electrical resistance of the wires carrying that power; you'll discover those loses are directed related to current and that you can trade current for voltage and trade voltage for current; so we can avoid losses by upping the voltage.

If you are referring to the fact that the Earth's crust is moving, we can have geologists do some work; estimate the distances spaces where we will be running our wires and put in sufficient slack to cover the time period until the next maintenance window.

If you are referring to weather event induced disruptions in the grid (wind/tornadoes/etc taking out power lines) then you build alternate paths to route around damage.

If you are referring to solar storms and coronal mass ejections, then you need standards in your equipment to deal with out of spec distribution lines.

All of which are technical problems and easy to solve.

If you are referring to the bureaucratic hellscape that is international coordination and cooperation, then yes that is the only huge problem preventing such a solution, despite its numerous global economic and environmental advantages.

1
submitted 10 months ago by greengnu@slrpnk.net to c/startrek@lemmy.ml
[-] greengnu@slrpnk.net 4 points 10 months ago

storage is only a problem if the global distribution grid is not created. The sun is always shining somewhere, especially if you realize we can leverage space to extend our collection.

cranes are just stupid energy storage (the F=ma bit basically makes this a non-starter) . Water in pumped storage only works out in huge scale (where you have mountains to provide a massive storage pool).

compressed air storage misses the point, use just a little more energy and you can use that energy to thermally separate CO2 from air. (This is a productive use of energy but bad efficiency for storage)

hydrogen production from water is a productive use if we want to remove hydrocarbons from some chemical processes but it is not an efficient battery.

Thermal storage of energy is very inefficient and not a good idea unless you are willing to waste a good deal of available energy.

And flywheels are not even mentioned and very wrong information about Tesla power walls.

[-] greengnu@slrpnk.net 5 points 10 months ago

The big companies are ignoring the sector and just plan on buying the most profitable startups that look promising.

So ignore the fortune 1000 entirely and invest in smaller companies that are hiring engineers in chemistry if your goal is to invest effectively in battery technology.

But you are missing the advances in metallurgy (superconducting metals are making great strides), mechanical engineering (flywheel technology is taking advantage of new micro-controlled magnetic bearings) and physics.

1

Doesn't work against fully autonomous drones but should limit remotely controlled ones.

[-] greengnu@slrpnk.net 3 points 10 months ago

Energy in the technical sense has always been a human right as we would literally die without it (ATP production kind of requires it and sunlight tends to power food production too)

If by energy you mean electricity or chemical energy in convenient containers (like butane canisters) then no but improving access would extend lives and reduce the total environmental pollution if done properly. As there is not an upper bound on how much every one could claim they need and lack of access to energy efficient options would make the lower bound insufficient for most people to live off.

[-] greengnu@slrpnk.net 31 points 10 months ago

Doom stops when people have hope. Teaching people how to climb to a solar punk future is the solution.

We need solar punk political candidates.

[-] greengnu@slrpnk.net 10 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago)

Well the minimal bars for electronics is:

0 - The repair manual exists and is readily available with full schematics of the item in question.

1 - Replacement parts are available for purchase.

2 - Compatible replacement parts are made by 2 or more 3rd party companies

3 - Designs for replacement parts are available

4 - Local maker space is able to make the needed replacement parts.

If you can't get level 0, you probably shouldn't buy it if you expect to keep it working for life.

view more: next ›

greengnu

joined 1 year ago
MODERATOR OF