helenslunch

Half of them use their real name.

Which would never be admissible as evidence in court. I could make an account right now using your name, would that make you criminally liable for anything that I say?

Also a lot of them are sharing links to content they've posted using their personal FB account or whatever.

Do you think I couldn't create a FB account with your name? Do you know how many friend requests I get every day from redundant accounts trying to masquerade as people I'm already friends with?

Okay so you're just sticking with repeating the same non-sense over and over.

But your reply makes no sense since the person I was replying to specifically said they didn't need subpoenas.

That’s what that’s what subpoenas are for

Did you just not read the part of their comment that I quoted?

all the police need to do is join any of the Telegram channels and see the evidence for themselves

I mean, that doesn't tell them who any of those people are?

🤔

I agree.

I literally have no idea what any of that is supposed to mean or how it's related to this discussion.

I self-host a Ghost blog. It's about as safe as any other service exposed to the internet.

Already here, that's where he posted this update:

https://mastodon.social/@christianselig/113234212271070308