helix

joined 3 years ago
[–] helix@lemmy.ml 0 points 3 years ago (1 children)

I never said they weren't both my accounts. Stop seeing nazi ghosts and fuck off, please.

[–] helix@lemmy.ml 0 points 3 years ago (3 children)

This user is operating with 2 accounts, @helix@lemmy.ml and @Helix@feddit.de

Thanks for reminding me. That's clearly to throw you off and dogwhistle some more. It's not because all lemmies look the same and this federation thing is a bit confusing sometimes.

[–] helix@lemmy.ml 1 points 3 years ago (7 children)

You call other people racist, which in my book is a serious crime, and then cry about when they tell you to fuck off? What are you, 12? Or have you simply never grown up?

Stop causing drama and stop trolling me. The new ignore feature will be live in a few weeks and I can't wait to test it on you.

I don't even know what a "12yo p*jeet ROM" is. After a short research I found out it's a derogatory term for people shitting in the street, who in my understanding probably don't even have the means to create ROMs as they don't have access to more basic infrastructure needed to piece them together. Your allegation doesn't even make any sense.

[–] helix@lemmy.ml 0 points 3 years ago* (last edited 3 years ago)

that doesn't hide metadata, the postal service can track it and you can trace back both the handwriting and reverse engineer the code. Someone can intercept the mail from many stations on the way, including your own post box.

I'd say that many messaging services offer more protection than that method.

You could, however, use PGP with elliptic curve cryptography, and send that via packet radio or something similar on a frequency only you know. To an uninvited person this only looks like garbage data or noise.

[–] helix@lemmy.ml 0 points 3 years ago* (last edited 3 years ago) (1 children)

Go take a look at the comments today on reddit r/linux on the new RISC-V Xiangshan CPU news. 60-70% of the comments will tell you something. And it seems to be in line with the attitude towards Huawei for some random reason.

The LKML is not reddit and Wenruo is a long time Kernel contributor. Whataboutism gets you nowhere.

[–] helix@lemmy.ml 0 points 3 years ago* (last edited 3 years ago) (3 children)

Are you so ignorant of the hegemonic war between USA and China, that you purposely ignore the vile statements […]

No, I also don't like the stupid "trade war" politics and policies the US of A have imposed upon China. I don't like the propaganda machine the US has going on. OTOH, you assume Qu Wenruo is brainwashed by Steve Bannon. You don't even realise how ridiculous that sounds. If I was Wenruo reading your post, I'd ask you if you're an idiot thinking that. This is about patches to the Linux Kernel, which you seem to know nothing about. I just realised your username and sighed because I wasted my time again.

[–] helix@lemmy.ml 0 points 3 years ago (5 children)

This is about work culture at Huawei, not China per se. China is not Huawei and Steve Bannon certainly doesn't have any power over the contributors mentioned in that thread. Stop these unfounded conspiracy theories and start providing proof.

2
submitted 3 years ago* (last edited 3 years ago) by helix@lemmy.ml to c/90s_interfaces@lemmy.ml
 

Jurassic Park, 1993.

[–] helix@lemmy.ml 2 points 3 years ago (1 children)

Reddit provides a neoliberal space, Raddle/Gab/chans (4chan et al) provide a far right safe space, and Lemmy provides a safe space as well.

I think you misspelt "echo chamber" as "safe space".

 
[–] helix@lemmy.ml 0 points 3 years ago (1 children)

well then, we should wait for a good explanation ;)

[–] helix@lemmy.ml 0 points 3 years ago (1 children)

Glad that I scrolled down and found a proper answer :) You're right. Google might track people using Signal this way, but it doesn't mean they have access to information they don't already have.

[–] helix@lemmy.ml 0 points 3 years ago (3 children)

Your comment includes no proper answer and no content, only an ad hominem. If you make a claim, the burden of proof is on your side of the argument, not on the responders'.

view more: next ›