[-] holdthecheese@lemmy.world 12 points 3 months ago

A final solution of sorts

[-] holdthecheese@lemmy.world 8 points 3 months ago

And yet, somehow still compelling. :(

[-] holdthecheese@lemmy.world 35 points 6 months ago

They could rule that it's a state law issue and not a federal decision.

[-] holdthecheese@lemmy.world 3 points 6 months ago* (last edited 6 months ago)

They'd have to allow any app to replace iMessages as their sms client.

Alternatively, you could argue that their monopoly in messaging is being unfairly applied in hardware. That would have to be brought up by a hardware vendor like One Plus.

[-] holdthecheese@lemmy.world 12 points 6 months ago

You can argue that they're unfairly using monopoly power. Same reason why MS was forced to allow windows to switch browsers.

[-] holdthecheese@lemmy.world 6 points 7 months ago

Do it. One of the best things the Internet ever enabled.

[-] holdthecheese@lemmy.world 3 points 7 months ago

In this thread: vicious assholes

[-] holdthecheese@lemmy.world 16 points 7 months ago

Interesting that article comes to the conclusion that uBlockOrigin Lite is basically as effective as the original and works on the new Manifest v3.

[-] holdthecheese@lemmy.world 2 points 7 months ago

Better analogy is that carpet baggers benefitted the south.

[-] holdthecheese@lemmy.world 4 points 7 months ago* (last edited 7 months ago)

Founders are big thinkers and risk takers. When a company has found success, the owners prefer to focus on scaling that value rather than doubling or tripling down on the next big thing but the founders often want to keep betting it all.

Put another way, if you bet 100 and have turned it into 1,000,000 would you want to get your money out or play roulette?

[-] holdthecheese@lemmy.world 2 points 7 months ago

That's not a loophole, it's a key provision of the law.

[-] holdthecheese@lemmy.world 3 points 9 months ago

Agree. This sounds like a slam dunk to me.

view more: next ›

holdthecheese

joined 11 months ago