kazakhspy

joined 1 year ago
[–] kazakhspy@lemmy.world 14 points 7 months ago (1 children)

How would you like to go to the school councelor?

[–] kazakhspy@lemmy.world 12 points 7 months ago (1 children)

I assume it is because they have lightning immunity, and the character that he described is using primarily lightning

[–] kazakhspy@lemmy.world 3 points 8 months ago (1 children)

Now I feel like me and my friends are playing dnd wrong. Ending encounters in 3 turns is very rare for us. Usually they last like ~6 turns. Sometimes more, but 3 and less is extremely rare for us.

[–] kazakhspy@lemmy.world 19 points 8 months ago

Yeah, its also not a binary “attractive/unattractive”. Out of those 10 people, they would be some who will find you neither attractive or unattractive, just kinda meh. And THEN add some who might find you attractive, but are either in a relationship themselves or like double or more your age.

I want that confidence back! Give it here, buddy, we dont deserve it!

[–] kazakhspy@lemmy.world -2 points 1 year ago (2 children)

Pretty sure I saw one like that on the steam forums, and people there were mad that it existed.

[–] kazakhspy@lemmy.world 1 points 1 year ago (3 children)

We can play the slippery slope game both ways. You say: if you dont remove a harmless mod, then bigots will start adding harmful mods.

I say: if we let moderators remove harmless mods because of their political ideology, they will start removing more and more mods that are not made by bigots, but disagree with moderators politics. Like for example, if player wants to play as a billionaire and exploit poor workers.

How about instead of playing the slippery slope, we just deal with actual harmful mod as they come. I mean, ffs, there is a mod that lets you kill children in Skyrim. Is removing pronoun selector really worse than that?

[–] kazakhspy@lemmy.world -2 points 1 year ago (6 children)

I am, like, mildly upset about it being removed, at most. Seems like moderation team is going a bit overboard, deleting something that seems extremely mild.

[–] kazakhspy@lemmy.world -3 points 1 year ago (5 children)

Was going to comment the same. How is this mod hurting anyone? Isnt this the point of modding, to tweak it a little bit to suit your tastes? Its not like its a rape or child molesting mod. Those things should get deleted. But this? Such a petty thing to do.

[–] kazakhspy@lemmy.world 2 points 1 year ago

fffffffuuuuuuuuuuuu

[–] kazakhspy@lemmy.world 2 points 1 year ago (1 children)

You sure shield master doesnt work on fireball? The AC bonus to DEX save doesnt apply, but taking no damage on a succesful save should still apply, no?

[–] kazakhspy@lemmy.world 1 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago) (4 children)

DMs, would you consider adding rogues/assasins as enemies against spellcaster who spam fireball? Or like a group of dwarfs with shield master? On one hand, it will encourage more variety in a future, on the other the spellcaster would feel bad that he cant do much in such a fight and would probably get killed quickly.

It doesnt feel right “punishing” a spellcaster who uses fireball as a solution to all his problems like that, right?

Edit: and make them tieflings as well…oh god…poor fireballers

[–] kazakhspy@lemmy.world 11 points 1 year ago (19 children)

Well here is your chance. Argue this issues sensibly.

view more: next ›