All TLS/HTTPS clients have a set of Certificate Authority keys which they trust. Your client will only accept a public key which is signed by a trusted CA's key. A proper CA will not sign a key for a domain when it has not verified that the entity that wants it's key signed actually controls the domain.

Um what? Since when are open standards that allow vendor interoperability a bad thing?

Die Globuli wirken halt noch nicht

The text is also incredible misleading. The data will still be harvested and monetized, just not for ads.

This is typical enshittification. Make an impossibly good service to gain marketshare. Then make it worse once you've eliminated all competition and dominate the market.

Ja, aber die CSU ist ja rechts, oder? Würden die das selber überhaupt bestreiten?

They are not alternatives because they don't have content. Streaming video is fairly trivial. Having content is not.

It's much more banal. YouTube is simply a monopoly abusing its market power. People would use alternatives if they existed.

Humans and AI are not the same and an equivalence should never be drawn.

An AI model is a derivative work of its training data and thus a copyright violation if the training data is copyrighted.

Most people don't give a shit about these things. It might actually decrease if Netflix just tells people to install Chrome to watch Stranger Things

I do mind. EEE is a well established strategy. Is time won't be different than every other time so massive tech company pretended to embrace open standards.