maevyn

joined 6 days ago
 
[–] maevyn@lemmy.blahaj.zone 4 points 17 hours ago (1 children)

I updated it a lil bit

[–] maevyn@lemmy.blahaj.zone 2 points 17 hours ago

Yeah, I agree re: Reagan. I think the overall point is more that there may need to be compromise to create a new coalition, because right now the Dems keep choosing economics that hurt the average person, and lean harder into socio-political progressivism to still appear left leaning.

-2
submitted 18 hours ago* (last edited 17 hours ago) by maevyn@lemmy.blahaj.zone to c/politicalmemes@lemmy.world
 

Updated it with better placement for Reagan and added FDR/Ike

[–] maevyn@lemmy.blahaj.zone 2 points 2 days ago

Yes, definitely agree it should require the doctor to approve as well, and the child should also consent. The point is that the government is interfering with both parents and doctors by stepping in. Feels very much like your body, my choice here.

[–] maevyn@lemmy.blahaj.zone 2 points 2 days ago

Obviously it would only be if the doctors and parents approved together. Point being, the government is stepping in and overriding my parental rights and my doctor’s recommendation just because someone else does not agree.

And I don’t see parents voting for bans, none of these have been initiatives. These are law makers.

[–] maevyn@lemmy.blahaj.zone -3 points 3 days ago (13 children)

Why are we debating this at all, shouldn’t it be the decision of the parents? You don’t agree, that’s fine, you can tell your kids no. If someone else looks at the evidence and believes it’s true, and believes this is hugely beneficial to their kid, why should the government have a say in their kid’s medical treatment?

[–] maevyn@lemmy.blahaj.zone 1 points 5 days ago

This is why I’ve been thinking we should focus on changing the voting system within primaries rather than in the general to start with. The general election is going to require massive amounts of effort and political will to change, but primaries could be changed more easily since it’s mainly up to the party itself (still could require some legal changes to update voting machines, etc)