maypull

I assumed everyone here had a similar level of reading comprehension. that was my mistake. have a nice night.

my whole comment was a hypothetical. so.... bye.

your mockery still doesn't change the facts

ok. you look up hypothetical, and we can meet back here to discuss!!

in this hypothtical, those are the other two options. I would know: I wrote the hypothetical

your mockery doesn't change whether it's a voter suppression tactic

I wasn't arguing about the definition of genocide. it's a pretty outlandish hypothetical for you to be worried about that.

I think we just have different ideas of what voter suppression looks like.

if on election day, an hour after teh polls open, everyone calls the election for cornel west, and people say "you can vote for one of the genocidal maniacs, but it won't matter. they can't possibly win", no one would characterize that any way except voter suppression.

those two deserve each other. let them have this.

i think we all agree he shouldn't have done that.

isn't the impotence of Lemmy voting there purest expression of voting?