If you have three particles, 1/3 of that is one particle. No need to divide an indivisible particle.
rbits
joined 1 year ago
Making your own protocols means vulnerabilities are more likely. Better to use one that's been tested and audited (unless it's following something like this EU thing of course)
Lol that's exactly what this was. I wrote this python script, and he went through and added comments like this a day before the deadline.
Not trying to throw shade on him though, it's more the university's fault for not explaining what makes a useful comment. I just thought it was funny
Oh my god that trailer was so good
You know the bot that replies with a haiku if your comments syllables match? They should do this instead
A tower defense game with a microprocessor theme
Does anyone remember that club penguin tower defence game where you defend against computer viruses?
Ok, I mean if you're getting financially screwed by your partner in a divorce, it's probably a good thing that you're getting divorced.
Yooo foone
Tell that to uber eats
Here's an underrated game recommendation: Patrick's Parabox. Probably the most well designed puzzle game I've ever played.
Pseudoregalia mentioned!
Also lol at "worse graphics" for Rainworld. An amazing looking game. Though it probably doesn't actually mean worse graphics, just less realistic graphics
Right, but you can have exactly a third of some group of particles. You can't have exactly pi of some group of particles I think is what they were saying