NONPOL wants to follow 3 simple concepts when we come up with manifesto ideas:
- All ideas have to be based on Common Sense; not what politics, habit or laziness have made us used to. Where people say, ‘That will never work’ we want to change it to ‘How can we make that work?’.
- All ideas must be supported with empirical data or solid logical arguments. Where there are competing ideas that have similar merit, the idea sponsor will need to argue his point and our members will vote on and agree a single accepted idea.
So, common sense ideas that are based on empirical data...right
Have they tried turning the voting off and on again?