Nah. Just the parts about slaves being obedient to their masters.
19
Young people in Africa call for a fair increase in funding for climate adaptation
(news.mongabay.com)
They care enough to do things like buy properties in cooler countries so they can move to them after making Saudi Arabia uninhabitable.
We're not quite that bad right now; efforts already taken probably dropped it to something more like 3°C of warming by 2100 with further warming thereafter.
Here's a gift link you can edit into your post so that (almost) everybody get seamless access to the article.
About the only way you could do worse is to appoint somebody who wants to get rid of the Department of Energy, but doesn't know what it is, and can't remember it's name.
Yeah, wind and solar seem to be able to go for 50+ years too. The main reason they're not doing that so far is that newer installations can kick out more electricity (and money) in the same footprint.
Right, but nuclear remains far more expensive than wind and solar, which is why almost no new nuclear gets built.
I'll also note that a chunk of the data is from 2007 and 2008, and the price (and greenhouse gas emissions associated with) both wind and solar have declined markedly since then.
He hasn't promised to be true to his oath of office.
Yeah, it's roughly at a peak, with the first actual drop seeming more likely to happen next year, rather than this year.
The point isn't to take advice; it's to push responsibility and blame onto somebody else.
The main problem with carbon removal is that it's expensive, and removing it doesn't produce a product you can sell. So in practice, doing something like what you describe within a generation requires a system of taxation which absorbs 40% or so of total economic output, and uses it to sequester carbon. That seems, to put it mildly, politically very difficult.
He cares about the young. Just not in the way you'd want.