soekarnoenjoyer

joined 2 years ago
 
 
 
[–] soekarnoenjoyer@lemmygrad.ml 29 points 1 year ago (1 children)

Look all of these Delicious Lemmy liberal Nonsense in this chat

[–] soekarnoenjoyer@lemmygrad.ml 23 points 1 year ago

Something something.. journal that speak for the millionares...

Cool copium bug

 

There is r/meth. A subreddit LITERALLY dedicated to meth, a dangerous addictived substances. And then theres r/GenUsa, subreddit that actually advocates to bomb brown children and supports us imperialism. Reddit quarantined soon-banned r/GenZedong. But not banned r/GenUsa and r/meth.

Srsly fuck reddit

[–] soekarnoenjoyer@lemmygrad.ml 1 points 2 years ago (1 children)

The fall of the USSR was a mistake

[–] soekarnoenjoyer@lemmygrad.ml 1 points 2 years ago

Are people starting to wake up against the bullshit ? This is amazing! Wonder how would the publisher reaction to that massive downvotes

 

I

[–] soekarnoenjoyer@lemmygrad.ml 4 points 2 years ago* (last edited 2 years ago)

Try to post this entire topic on twitter and see hundreds of stupid dog NAFO CraKKKers try to justify the word 'slava ukraini' as not nazi and also being labeled as a tankie, putin apologist or a russian bot.

 
 

Imagine if china won the world cup. How would everyone in western social media especially sinophobic anti-chinese people react.. would the cope and tears be so high like the beijing olympics ?

 
 
[–] soekarnoenjoyer@lemmygrad.ml 1 points 2 years ago

"During the cold war, the anticommunist ideological framework could transform any data about existing communist societies into hostile evidence. If the Soviets refused to negotiate a point, they were intransigent and belligerent; if they appeared willing to make concessions, this was but a skillful ploy to put us off our guard. By opposing arms limitations, they would have demonstrated their aggressive intent; but when in fact they supported most armament treaties, it was because they were mendacious and manipulative. If the churches in the USSR were empty, this demonstrated that religion was suppressed; but if the churches were full, this meant the people were rejecting the regime’s atheistic ideology. If the workers went on strike (as happened on infrequent occasions), this was evidence of their alienation from the collectivist system; if they didn’t go on strike, this was because they were intimidated and lacked freedom. A scarcity of consumer goods demonstrated the failure of the economic system; an improvement in consumer supplies meant only that the leaders were attempting to placate a restive population and so maintain a firmer hold over them.

If communists in the United States played an important role struggling for the rights of workers, the poor, African-Americans, women, and others, this was only their guileful way of gathering support among disfranchised groups and gaining power for themselves. How one gained power by fighting for the rights of powerless groups was never explained. What we are dealing with is a nonfalsifiable orthodoxy, so assiduously marketed by the ruling interests that it affected people across the entire political spectrum."

-Michael Parenti, Blackshirts and red

[–] soekarnoenjoyer@lemmygrad.ml 1 points 2 years ago* (last edited 2 years ago) (1 children)

Khruschev Not Sending More tanks in 1956 has been a disaster for The entirety of the Hungarian Nation

[–] soekarnoenjoyer@lemmygrad.ml 1 points 2 years ago

Rest in piss You wont be missed even after more than 70 years 🤣👌👌👌

view more: ‹ prev next ›