tartarsauce

Which is why I’m a full time lemm.ee user for now bc at the time it had 0 blocked instances and was blocked by 0 too^^

aye, that's the real beauty of the fediverse; every person can find an instance which suits their preferences. those like us can find more hands-off instances if we want to, and equally people who prefer more moderation can easily find a more heavily moderated/curated instance.

But ultimately, new users shouldn’t have to worry about such things, which is why I can’t see Lemmy growing as a whole with the tools available now.

maybe an unpopular opinion, but i don't care so much about lemmy growing. it's great right now, having achieved a lot of growth recently bringing lots of interesting content and community, but still not being so big to the point where all the disadvantages of a reddit-sized userbase start to show.

hell, maybe it's better that lemmy never grows as big as the centralized sites, the people who prefer all the advantages of decentralized social media can move here, whereas those who prioritize convenience/ease of use can stay on the big sites. the annoyance of defederations is in some sense just a part of how the protocol works, and not something that can be "solved" per se; the people who are here choose to put up with it in exchange for all the advantages.

one thing that could be done though, is for the lemmy software to have an easy option for migrating all your account data like mastodon does. the poor lemmy devs (literally just 2 dudes) are up to their necks in water just keeping track of the flood in the issues and pull requests right now, so it's not likely lemmy will get new features soon, but hopefully people will step in to help them as well. if i was good enough at rust (or programming in general) i'd try to help too.

thankfully, that isn't really the case on your (which also happens to be my) instance.

we've been blocked by precisely one actual instance - the predominantly German-speaking feddit.de, for having open signups, which i'm sure is something we could hash out with them in the future. (technically there are also instances that block us which are run by single persons for their own use. in effect, this amounts to a single user blocking us for themselves, which obviously is fine).

we ourselves have defederated from precisely one instance - lemmygrad.ml, the political one for authoritarian communists. this was probably done to avoid unpleasant political spam posts from showing up. personally, i think we could get rid of even this one block as the users can decide whether to block that instance for themselves or not; i might post asking about it later.

and most importantly, the admins here have explicitly stated that the policy is to avoid defederation at all possible avenues. this statement more than anything really made me feel like i chose the right instance.

FMHY for the win!

Yeah. Instead, the things that benefit users

thank god someone else is finding humor in this too. i laughed at the sheer absurdity of half the comments in that thread. people can really easily lose all sense of proportion

exactly, and that's what matters more than anything else. modern websites are insanely bloated anyway; i care more about blocking the 50MB of ads, trackers, third-party cookies and other garbage every site shoves down your throat, than shiny new stuff that arguably is often part of that overengineered bloat.

look at this. it's fucking beautiful. as far as i'm concerned, websites like these put the modern web and web developers to shame.

while I didn't mind having this show up in my feed, i'm glad that you kept in mind the cultural norms against self-promotion on reddit, which i think will (and definitely should!) carry over to lemmy/kbin. i think it's important to be mindful of it especially when linking one's own external site.

and since this is the fediverse, it could and should go further on the privacy front than reddit did. i'd really like if in the future we see lemmy/kbin develop etiquette around linking sites which load google analytics/other spyware and trackers.

p.s. i'm not on mastodon. how do you tag a lemmy community from it? using a tag in the body of the post, like you would for another mastodon user?

yes to the first. to the second, yes and no both.

to outrageously oversimplify, a disk partition, or partition for short, is simply a separate region on a storage disk (which can be anything, whether it be your computer's hard drive, a USB drive, an SSD etc).

you can shrink, expand, delete and create partitions according to your will (as long as you have enough space on your disk). space on the disk not belonging to any partition is called unallocated space.

it is necessary to have your disk structured into multiple such partitions ^1^ to install multiple operating systems on a single disk (in fact, most OSes use multiple separate partitions on the disk by themselves^2^ ).

dual booting is simply when you have multiple operating systems running on the same computer. if you're going to have both of them installed on a single disk, then sure, you'd need to create separate partition(s) for the new OS.

and by "you" i don't mean you manually do it. for practical purposes, basically all the linux distros these days have an automated installer which can detect what OSes (such as windows) are already on the disk, and will automatically create the required partitions in the unallocated space available, and install the OS in those (when it asks you about where to install to, just select the option named something like "Install alongside Windows"). there's really no need to dick with the partitions manually as a beginner when your distro's installer will take care of that for you, except maybe if you want to create space for linux to install itself to^3^.

so, the answers are:

1 - yes, creating a new disk partition and dual-booting are two separate things.

2 - could you install for dual boot without creating a partition in the process? not really, as fundamentally operating systems, whether windows, linux or anything else, need to be installed to partition(s) on a disk. it's just that the OS' installer usually does all the partitioning for you

2.1 - could you dual-boot without manually creating a partition, or touching partitions in any way? sure. if you're installing an OS to a separate disk for example, you could let the installer simply overwrite, repartition, and install to that disk and run both OSes off separate disks on the same computer.

if you're installing both OSes on the same disk, then you can also usually let the installer take care of installing linux alongside windows without a problem. the only thing is that if you don't have enough space as you'd like for the linux install, you may have to resize your windows partition yourself to create more.

+++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++

notes:

(this is all stuff you don't really have to care about right now! (though you may want to read no. 3 later on, when you're actually installing linux on your main system.) it might confuse you more than helping, and it really isn't required for you to understand, but read on if you're interested)

1:

here is an example disk layout on a disk that has both windows and linux installed. to learn about the structure of your own disk (if you want to), on Windows you can fire up the preinstalled utility Disk Management and have a look.

2:

a modern Linux installation, for example, usually has the following on your disk:

• an EFI system partition (contains stuff required for the computer to boot the OS partition)
• a main partition where the actual OS and data is
• optionally, a swap partition
• some people also prefer to keep a separate partition for their /home/ directory (the folder that contains all your user account's data, separate from the OS and the programs installed on it), which is useful (among other things) to install a different Linux variant on the OS partition, while keeping all of their user data and seamlessly using it with the new installation.

a standard Windows installation also has multiple separate partitions on your disk (apologies for not finding a better source but this details them well enough).

3:

the only scenario in which you might have to touch the partitions yourself is if your disk doesn't have enough unallocated space to comfortably use a linux install. (as a comparatively lightweight OS, even the very heaviest variants of linux shouldn't go over 4GB in terms of space strictly needed for installation, but you also need some actual storage space to have your files and stuff in lol).

in such a scenario, you could shrink your main windows partition if there's enough space (Explorer should tell you how much free space you have). for example, if your windows partition is 300GB but it's only occupying 200GB of space, you could shrink the windows partition down to 250GB, leaving 50GB of unallocated space on the disk for linux partitions.

to do this using the preinstalled Disk Management utility on Windows, right click the Windows partition you want to shrink (whether C:/, D:/ etc.), select Shrink, and follow the instructions. please be sure to select the right amount of space to shrink it by according to what you want, and confirm again that it's correct.

please exercise care, as messing up your disk partitions could royally screw up your OS. what you're doing here can't really hurt anything, but make sure to follow the instructions carefully. if possible, back up all your important data before attempting this.

once you've got what you think is the adequate balance of Windows and unallocated (soon to be Linux) space for your needs, boot into the distro from your usb and let the installer take care of the rest.