waarismijnhoofd

joined 2 years ago
[–] waarismijnhoofd@mastodon.nl 1 points 2 months ago (1 children)

@stupidcasey I like have conversations, but don’t appreciate your tone of voice. That’s why I’ll block you. This is not Twitter.

[–] waarismijnhoofd@mastodon.nl 1 points 2 months ago (3 children)

@stupidcasey @stupidcasey so you really seriously think based on that above chart that US and then China are the ‘best performing’ countries and the fact that they have a huge population has nothing to do with it????

[–] waarismijnhoofd@mastodon.nl 1 points 2 months ago (5 children)

@stupidcasey
if a country has 12x a pool of people to pick their best athletes from, wouldn’t you agree that would hugely increase their winning chances?
If two schools compete in a chess match, 1 school has 100 students, the other 1200 students, and they both send their best chess player, with all other factors being equal, who would you put your money on?

[–] waarismijnhoofd@mastodon.nl 0 points 2 months ago

@stupidcasey And what all of this has to do with any political agenda; beats me! 🤣🤣🤣

[–] waarismijnhoofd@mastodon.nl 0 points 2 months ago* (last edited 2 months ago) (8 children)

@stupidcasey Ok, let me explain: if you look at the chart it looks like the US is doing much much better than Australia. Twice the # of medals and about same score on human development index. Truth is US has over 12x the population of Australia.
If you adjust per my suggestion you’d see that Australia is doing ~6x better than US instead of US doing ~2x better than Australia as it is in the chart now. Much more realistic, isn’t it?

[–] waarismijnhoofd@mastodon.nl 4 points 2 months ago (10 children)

@LabPlot @dataisbeautiful
Doesn’t make sense unless you calculate in population size. Best way to do this is to have “# medals per capita ratio” on the vertical axis instead of simply # medals.