zovits

joined 1 year ago
[–] zovits@lemmy.world 3 points 2 months ago

Or by generating the hashes of all expected permutations of the password the user has just set, and keeping them until the next password is set to compare against. Granted, that would be a prodigious number, but technically doable.

[–] zovits@lemmy.world 3 points 2 months ago

If your comment is sarcasm, then it's brilliant.

[–] zovits@lemmy.world 0 points 5 months ago

Ah, I think I got the source of misunderstanding: these mechanisms are not automated, but implemented as moderation guidelines and rules.

[–] zovits@lemmy.world 3 points 5 months ago (4 children)

SO has mechanisms in place to filter out AI-generated content.

[–] zovits@lemmy.world 4 points 5 months ago

Editing any content to reduce its quality is considered vandalism and gets reverted on SO.

[–] zovits@lemmy.world 1 points 5 months ago

Except it's not your data anymore. By submitting any content, you transfer the rights to SO.

[–] zovits@lemmy.world 8 points 5 months ago

Vandalism is always reverted on SO, even if done by the original author. No knowledge is lost. Suing OA for violating the CC-BY license might be possible, but I'd wager SO is not interested in suing them, and since they hold the rights, not much can be done by others.

[–] zovits@lemmy.world 37 points 7 months ago (2 children)

The OneBlade has a transformer in the wall plug part, the actual cable going to the handheld unit is only carrying low voltage.

[–] zovits@lemmy.world 4 points 7 months ago (1 children)

I'm all for setting a precedent if it's about banning chinese spyware and propaganda weapons.

[–] zovits@lemmy.world -5 points 8 months ago

The proper response would have been to apologize at the first opportunity.

 

Hypothetically, if a colleague has repeatedly demonstrated the utter lack of reading comprehension skills (like pulling the same door labelled "push" for the hundredth time), what job could one suggest for them where this "disability" wouldn't be detrimental?

 

AFAIK it all boils down to the fact that during embryonal development our cells, which at that point were just a blob of undifferentiated autonomous chemical machines, somehow managed to unanimously agree upon the cardinal directions (up-down, left-right, front-back) for future development - and thanks to this, we don't have toes growing out of our ears.

view more: next ›