What’s going on in both revolutionary and reactionary politics in America is a strong dislike for the current regime which is oppressive and brutal economically while taking mixed stances on social issues. Reactionaries want to create issues for all of us, but they are anti-government and say things which sometimes say similar things to comrades. It is important to keep in mind that someone is not a good person or an ally to the masses just because they hate America. Even Osama Bin Laden understood the evils of zionism and had very progressive ideas on the liberation of Palestine, but then went on to support fundamentalism and fought against the Soviet Union with CIA funding. The fact that so many people hate America does not say much about the ideologies they hold, but is more a consequence of the ridiculously long list of enemies the regime has and continues to create for itself.

Even people separate from radical ideologies hate America for reasons that are completely independent from any existing political ideology because the regime is that bad. Random people with very little interest in politics even begin to grow disdain for the regime due to imperialism and the occupation of their lands or coercion of their nations to western imperialists. There are even liberals who hate America, ironically enough.

Reactionaries and radical liberals may be doing things that damage the political systems of the regime, but they are not contributing towards the freedom of the people since they are not socialists. While an organization led by comrades should allow them to participate, the comrades of any Marxist tendency should be following materialism and should not resort to distorting its positions in favor of liberal or reactionary idealism. Appealing to other non-Marxist ideologies or reformism like this may increase popularity or membership in the short term, but it inevitably causes an organization to fall apart or simply become redundant.

Reddit moment.

The question of whether communism is purely economic is a tricky one. On one hand, the theory is mainly economic and as communists we understand that the root of all politics is economics, because we need to know how the people are going to eat and also how resources are going to be distributed in our society. However, there is something strange going on where unsavory characters are advocating communist economic systems while also upholding rightist and first-worldist ideas that are used to reinforce inequality and the continuation of capitalism. At best they completely misunderstand how such a system would affect society, and at worst they want to create a form of socialism only for the people who are already relatively privileged in society and exclude those who they are prejudiced against.

While communism is technically purely economic, the ideas of socialism create an environment that makes oppression of people by the bourgeoisie impossible. If we understand the United States to be a plutocracy and playground for the world’s bourgeoisie and also a settler-colonial nation that continues to exist at the expense of the indigenous people, then we cannot justify a socialist project that continues the existence of America in its current form or even a recognizable form. There is a reason that those who seek to overthrow capitalism are those who have the most to gain from its destruction. These are ethnic minorities, discriminated people, or those who are not allowed to live peacefully or make a living under the current organization of society. Those who are homeless or those who struggle are the ones who will truly want to dismantle the system and create something equal. The relatively privileged classes of society such as White Americans do have a lot to gain by overthrowing the bourgeois regime and establishing democratic control of the economy, but this would require allowing minorities to have a voice as well which requires them to see beyond the short-term comforts granted to them by colonial privilege and white supremacy.

So while communism on paper is purely economic, the philosophy is anti-imperialist which would make it incompatible with any pro-America sentiment and would require decolonization in Turtle Island and an end to the imperialist wars that liberal politicians continue to call for. It is also dialectical and would require the people to look deeper than blaming the oppressed peoples for their own problems, instead looking to the material conditions which drive human behavior and the circumstances that lead to society becoming the way it is. For people who have spent life under capitalist oppression and developed survivorship biases, just world fallacies and other ideas to help them cope with the brutality they lived through, this takes some mental effort. Even that is assuming they don’t participate in even more overtly reactionary politics that we see in The US, where politicians openly advocate cutting welfare and taking food and housing away from working class families and the media actively cultivates prejudices against ethnic minorities.

Communism may be based in economics, but it is a theory that makes current systems of oppression substantially more difficult if not impossible to maintain, at least on an economic level. It is not an ideology that is meant to appease reactionaries based on their conspiracies of ethnic replacement or their desire to force religion onto oppressed peoples. Communism is a system by and for the working class, and the working class includes those who are discriminated against and often looked down upon by society. Any form of socialism that seeks to exclude any segment of the working class or grant extra privilege to a white working class is reactionary, revisionist and non-dialectical.

In Japan during the times of shogunate, kabuki theater was targeted by the government for “Corrupting public morals” and “Being sexualized.” Sound familiar? Kabuki theater was also adapted and changed due to a series of bans put on Japanese society by the government and evolved in response. Sound familiar? Despite this, the performances of kabuki are so influential that the images associated with them have influenced the society of the country to the point you can see influences in modern pop culture from Japan to this day. Even foreigners are able to recognize the iconic imagery of kabuki and associate it with that country.

If we understand drag to be significant enough in society for political extremists and religious fundamentalists to have problems with it, then why is it not considered significant? And if it is a type of art theater performance and a form of self expression then why is it not considered heritage or of cultural value? The stigma put onto it seems to cause many opponents of it to try and make it disappear for impractical moralistic reasons. The intangible culture of drag shows must be protected from those who seek to destroy it, and recognition should be granted to these types of performances so they can be protected and preserved. This type of performance has influenced mainstream trends and humor already, so any attempts to stop it will inevitably be futile and ineffective and only serve to show the incompetence of the regime.

The title of today’s post is not intended for comrades that will read this in my communities Lavenderism or EcoMaoism, but rather the pro-Biden liberals that are brigading my religious community and EcoMaoism to say that I am a Russian bot, that I am a trump supporter, or am being paid by the CCP to spread anti-American propaganda. Unfortunately I am not a member of the Chinese Communist Party, and am propagandizing my ideology solely for survival and an end to the brutal oppression put onto us by the regime that these people love so much. We are not given food, water, medicine, we can’t even go to college in this country anymore. Anyone who dares to say they have no food or cannot feed their families meets a barrage of insults from the liberals. I do not love dictators just because the last one was worse, and I do not suspend my critical thinking or participate in sham democracies in desperate attempts to get breadcrumbs from the bourgeois class.

So the comrades in China or True Korea are (unfortunately) not paying me to spread my ideas on social media, so why the hell am I doing it? I’m on the internet because I do not want humanity to be destroyed by capitalism. If you look at the groups that Russia is paying to do things like that, they do not even have coherent ideologies. Russia is paying Neo-Nazis to go on twitter and say they hate Anne Frank, just to cause chaos in America.

I went through the same indoctrination that you did, I was even put into advanced classes where they taught us to love the dictator and the American regime no matter how bad of oppression or soul crushing poverty they put us through. However, these classes are ineffective to anyone who knows about the US government or what they actually do abroad. I won’t get into it here because it’s beside the point and requires a long explanation that would inflate today’s post.

You may be scared of the systems falling apart in the US, but if they cannot adapt to the reality of the modern world it will happen eventually anyway. You need to get off that sinking ship of two-party liberal politics and choose a real side that will exist once America does not. Stop defending politicians that despise you and actively throw you under the bus to appease their millionaire lobbyists! Biden despises you, Trump despises you! Even Obama despises you! Every president has come from wealthy backgrounds and is not going to throw their own class under the bus for a working person. Why do you think the country is the way it is right now? Why do you think Palestine is being handled the way it is by Biden? It’s never too late to pick up Marxist theory. Free resources exist at the Marxist Internet Archive and will help you to develop a dialectical understanding of the politics of this country.