this post was submitted on 01 Aug 2024
79 points (95.4% liked)

Technology

34904 readers
301 users here now

This is the official technology community of Lemmy.ml for all news related to creation and use of technology, and to facilitate civil, meaningful discussion around it.


Ask in DM before posting product reviews or ads. All such posts otherwise are subject to removal.


Rules:

1: All Lemmy rules apply

2: Do not post low effort posts

3: NEVER post naziped*gore stuff

4: Always post article URLs or their archived version URLs as sources, NOT screenshots. Help the blind users.

5: personal rants of Big Tech CEOs like Elon Musk are unwelcome (does not include posts about their companies affecting wide range of people)

6: no advertisement posts unless verified as legitimate and non-exploitative/non-consumerist

7: crypto related posts, unless essential, are disallowed

founded 5 years ago
MODERATORS
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] vulgarcynic@sh.itjust.works 50 points 3 months ago* (last edited 3 months ago) (3 children)

Buying stock is a risk. If you don't know what you're buying, don't be surprised when it fails.

I'm exhausted with investors thinking they aren't subject to risk. Fuck em all.

[–] magic_lobster_party@kbin.run 18 points 3 months ago (1 children)

Risks are normally outside the reasonable control of the company. For example, sales not hitting the target. They can’t just press a button and up goes the sales.

This was entirely within the company’s control. That risk shouldn’t ever be there at all. They could’ve avoided the entire situation if they chose not to ship the faulty software.

[–] PowerCrazy@lemmy.ml -4 points 3 months ago (1 children)

Brilliant. Simply write software without bugs. You should certainly be in charge.

[–] magic_lobster_party@kbin.run 6 points 3 months ago (1 children)

Or just test the damn thing before shipping it to customers. That’s standard practice in the software industry.

If they had just installed it on one of their own Windows machines, none of this would’ve happened.

[–] Jax@sh.itjust.works 6 points 3 months ago* (last edited 3 months ago)

Testing? You expect this person to consider testing?

That's an extra step that will realistically lead to more work! That's outrageous, can't have that. Just won't do.

[–] gencha@lemm.ee 3 points 3 months ago

If you own shares of a company, you literally own part of that company. To be able to sell shares of your company, you have legal obligations. By putting your shareholders capital at risk by unsafe practices, you fail to deliver on your obligations and can be held liable. Shareholders of large companies are not exclusively greedy investors. Retirement funds can also be backed by capital that is bound in stocks. If your fund holds shares that lost value due to incompetence of the company executives, it is similarly your legal obligation to take legal action in the interest of the people who paid into your fund.

[–] diskmaster23@lemmy.one 2 points 3 months ago

By suing themselves, they are losing out. Like, if you don't like the leadership, then get rid of them, that's why you have a board of directors. These lawsuits from shareholders is stupid.