this post was submitted on 29 Jul 2024
92 points (98.9% liked)

World News

2304 readers
161 users here now

founded 4 years ago
MODERATORS
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] Hello_Kitty_enjoyer@hexbear.net 1 points 3 months ago* (last edited 3 months ago) (1 children)

you literally can't keep track of the argument lmao. done

the original argument was "losing arunachal = water insecurity"

you countered with "uhhh the tsangpo is acktshyually in Tibet" and ignored the massive amounts of water (snow) from Arunachal itself

somehow you can't admit that you're wrong, or you can't keep track of what was said 4 comments ago

Hint: wanna actually disprove what I said? look at the volume flow rates for all those rivers on your map, and show me that a large amount of it originates from before it hits Arunachal

[–] Red_sun_in_the_sky@hexbear.net 1 points 3 months ago* (last edited 2 months ago) (1 children)
[–] Hello_Kitty_enjoyer@hexbear.net 1 points 3 months ago (1 children)

You on the other hand keep insisting that arunachal is the focal point where the river starts and therefore its being grabbed by china.

Never said this, come up with more interesting headcanon

No ones genuinely buys that siang just pops out arunachal.

Again, never said this. the point is that losing control of 90% of your water supply is a lot worse than the current situation of not controlling 10% of it. Numbers!

[–] Red_sun_in_the_sky@hexbear.net 1 points 3 months ago* (last edited 2 months ago)