this post was submitted on 02 Aug 2024
63 points (100.0% liked)

TechTakes

1384 readers
284 users here now

Big brain tech dude got yet another clueless take over at HackerNews etc? Here's the place to vent. Orange site, VC foolishness, all welcome.

This is not debate club. Unless it’s amusing debate.

For actually-good tech, you want our NotAwfulTech community

founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] spookex@lemmy.world -3 points 3 months ago (3 children)

General purpose” mostly means LLMs. Companies have a year to write documentation and promise to follow copyright.

Says it right there

[–] mawhrin@awful.systems 9 points 3 months ago (1 children)

how does allowing the ai companies to ignore copyright improve the situation, pray tell?

[–] Architeuthis@awful.systems 8 points 3 months ago

Next time Lars Ulrich sues you you'll be able to say you needed the Some Kind of Monster mp3s for AI research. It's foolproof.

[–] bitofhope@awful.systems 9 points 3 months ago (1 children)

Takes me much less than a year to promise to do anything.

[–] fasterandworse@awful.systems 7 points 3 months ago

I love how the time factor is always ignored when tech companies eventually comply with regulation or just do the right thing. "at least they did it" isn't an argument, it's a consolation.

It took airbnb over a year(!) to show all the fees up front on the search results page instead of waiting to show them on the checkout page. That's over a year after their asshat CEO announced on twitter that they would be doing it (to quell the social media uproar about how deceptive it was)

[–] bitofhope@awful.systems 5 points 3 months ago

This quote got me rent free. If I break a law I don't like for a couple of years, do I also get another year to "promise" to stop breaking it in the future?