3DPrinting
3DPrinting is a place where makers of all skill levels and walks of life can learn about and discuss 3D printing and development of 3D printed parts and devices.
The r/functionalprint community is now located at: !functionalprint@kbin.social or !functionalprint@fedia.io
There are CAD communities available at: !cad@lemmy.world or !freecad@lemmy.ml
Rules
-
No bigotry - including racism, sexism, ableism, homophobia, transphobia, or xenophobia. Code of Conduct.
-
Be respectful, especially when disagreeing. Everyone should feel welcome here.
-
No porn (NSFW prints are acceptable but must be marked NSFW)
-
No Ads / Spamming / Guerrilla Marketing
-
Do not create links to reddit
-
If you see an issue please flag it
-
No guns
-
No injury gore posts
If you need an easy way to host pictures, https://catbox.moe/ may be an option. Be ethical about what you post and donate if you are able or use this a lot. It is just an individual hosting content, not a company. The image embedding syntax for Lemmy is 
Moderation policy: Light, mostly invisible
view the rest of the comments
As far as i can tell there is nothing regarding 3d printing in the article. I don’t think it is too much to ask to keep a community for 3d printing on topic. This seems to be some news piece about someone who had influence on / contributed to the 3d printing community, but as it’s not directly about 3d printing, I honestly fail to see the relevance.
No. This is very relevant to this community. Naomi has been a great member of this community. She is an engineer and is known for bringing innovative products to market; many with her name on them.
Furthermore she is being targeted for LGBTQ+. That makes the issue doubly relevant to all real humans.
I think you're way out of line with the insults and broad accusations. I am bare new to the 3D printing community and I never heard of Naomi Wu before. The article only mentions she is an influencer, and this discussion makes little to no efforts to add context to why is a particular influencer relevant to 3D printing.
Calls to clarification are faced with comments like yours, accusing those of asking a simple question of being incels.
This behavior reflects poorly upon you in particular and the 3D printing community in general. Please pay attention to what you say and do.
Seriously?
You've typed too many words to try to rationalize your toxic behavior.
I repeat: pay attention to what you say and do. All communities have their bad apples, but this does not grant the likes of you the right to spoil the whole barrel.
Ah, you forgot to check the "about community", or "sidebar", or whatever it shows as in your app of choice.
It's an easy thing to forget.
If you had, you would note that there are no rules against posts regarding related, and not technical subjects.
This means you don't have to see the relevance. As long as the mods do, it's all good.
From the community info:
This doesn't appear to be discussing "3D printing and development of 3D printed parts and devices".
I don't think there's anything wrong with content being curated to fit the community that's literally the entire point of communities. Just because someone says this should be on a different community doesn't make them an incel. It's called content curation, it's the whole point of having multiple communities.
Am I missing something? Where did anyone specifically get accused of being an incel in this thread?
Discussion of influential figures in the broader 3D printing community is as valid as posts, videos, or articles about related tools, products, and news.
Oh, looks like I directed that at the wrong person. My bad. Here's the comment in question:
https://lemmy.world/comment/2496803