this post was submitted on 05 Aug 2024
2059 points (97.9% liked)

Technology

58115 readers
4871 users here now

This is a most excellent place for technology news and articles.

Our Rules

  1. Follow the lemmy.world rules.
  2. Only tech related content.
  3. Be excellent to each another!
  4. Mod approved content bots can post up to 10 articles per day.
  5. Threads asking for personal tech support may be deleted.
  6. Politics threads may be removed.
  7. No memes allowed as posts, OK to post as comments.
  8. Only approved bots from the list below, to ask if your bot can be added please contact us.
  9. Check for duplicates before posting, duplicates may be removed

Approved Bots

founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS
L3s@lemmy.world
enu@lemm.ee
fry@fry.gs
L3s@fry.gs
enu@lemmy.world
L4s@fry.gs
L4s@lemmy.world
2059
uBlock Origin developer recommends switching to Firefox as Chrome flags the extension (github.com)
submitted 1 month ago* (last edited 1 month ago) by TheImpressiveX@lemmy.ml to c/technology@lemmy.world
277 comments fedilink hide all child comments
 

~~https://www.neowin.net/news/ublock-origin-developer-recommends-switching-to-ublock-lite-as-chrome-flags-the-extension/~~

EDIT: Apologies. Updated with a link to what gorhill REALLY said:

Manifest v2 uBO will not be automatically replaced by Manifest v3 uBOL[ight]. uBOL is too different from uBO for it to silently replace uBO -- you will have to explicitly make a choice as to which extension should replace uBO according to your own prerogatives.

Ultimately whether uBOL is an acceptable alternative to uBO is up to you, it's not a choice that will be made for you.

Will development of uBO continue? Yes, there are other browsers which are not deprecating Manifest v2, e.g. Firefox.

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] cygnus@lemmy.ca 272 points 1 month ago (3 children)

They should recommend switching to Firefox instead. It's clear that Google cannot be allowed to have a monopoly on browsers.

[–] Cheradenine@sh.itjust.works 119 points 1 month ago (1 children)

The title is misleading, or false.

https://github.com/gorhill/uBlock/wiki/uBlock-Origin-works-best-on-Firefox

This document explains why uBO works best in Firefox.

[–] jabathekek@sopuli.xyz 33 points 1 month ago (1 children)

The title is misleading, or false.

[–] JackFrostNCola@lemmy.world 6 points 1 month ago (1 children)

Welcome to 2024, where people only read the headline and the article is compiled by AI

[–] partial_accumen@lemmy.world 69 points 1 month ago (2 children)

Even better is FF mobile (on Android) supports full list of addons, including uBlock Origin.

The using the web without uBlock Origin is cancer.

[–] Miimikko@lemmy.world 21 points 1 month ago (1 children)

Though not container tabs (yet)?

[–] sugar_in_your_tea@sh.itjust.works 12 points 1 month ago

Unfortunately no.

[–] undefined@links.hackliberty.org 3 points 1 month ago

How do you account for all other apps? My personal preference is using VPN along with DNS filtering to cut shit out system-wide.

I’m on iOS but the number of telemetry, tracking and ad domains requested by apps outside the browser is alarming (many of them owned by Google).

[–] Teknikal@eviltoast.org 9 points 1 month ago* (last edited 1 month ago)

They should I've been using mull on mobile and Librewolf on Windows 10 since the first time Google announced these Anti Adblock intensions. Must be a few years now.

I did mess with Thorium a little when it claimed to be the fastest browser on earth but yeah apart from that I've been using hardened Firefox forks