this post was submitted on 05 Aug 2024
220 points (89.6% liked)

Political Memes

5282 readers
3092 users here now

Welcome to politcal memes!

These are our rules:

Be civilJokes are okay, but don’t intentionally harass or disturb any member of our community. Sexism, racism and bigotry are not allowed. Good faith argumentation only. No posts discouraging people to vote or shaming people for voting.

No misinformationDon’t post any intentional misinformation. When asked by mods, provide sources for any claims you make.

Posts should be memesRandom pictures do not qualify as memes. Relevance to politics is required.

No bots, spam or self-promotionFollow instance rules, ask for your bot to be allowed on this community.

founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS
 
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] snooggums@midwest.social 59 points 1 month ago* (last edited 1 month ago) (1 children)

They are extremely different, and both should be perfectly acceptable in their repective contexts.

Griffin's severed head was not a call to violence. It was a reaction to Trump saying shitty stuff about Megyn Kelly bleeding:

GRIFFIN: I did say, I want to do some kind of a picture to shame Trump.

SANDERS: Griffin said she was mad at Trump for what he said about Megyn Kelly, the former Fox News host, after she grilled him in a presidential debate in 2015.

PRESIDENT DONALD TRUMP: You know, you could see there was blood coming out of her eyes, blood coming out of her - wherever. But...

[–] AShadyRaven@lemmy.zip 27 points 1 month ago (3 children)

not a call to violence

fuck that

when are we allowed to call for violence then? How many people does a fascist have to kill before we are allowed to wish death back on him?

How Nazi does a Nazi have to be before you're allowed to kill it?

[–] snooggums@midwest.social 27 points 1 month ago (1 children)

I didn't say a call to violence wasn't warranted, just that Griffin's photoshoot was not a call to violence.

[–] AShadyRaven@lemmy.zip 13 points 1 month ago

i didnt misunderstand you, i was speaking to the royal you

I think you're swell and you did a good job conveying your thoughts above

[–] Semi_Hemi_Demigod@lemmy.world 15 points 1 month ago (1 children)

The pearl-clutching about political violence is rich coming from people who celebrate political violence on 7/4 every year.

[–] AShadyRaven@lemmy.zip 12 points 1 month ago

im not suggesting political violence

im suggesting self defense against social murder and fascism

but yes i agree w you

[–] JayDee@lemmy.ml 4 points 1 month ago (1 children)

I've said it before, I'll say it again:

Political systems hinge on people following the nonviolent bureaucratic process for them to exist, so anyone who supports a political system's existence will always condemn violence for political gain, and will punish any violence they feel threatens the status quo. You can still do violence, but you will face punishment for it. Same as during the Union Wars.

[–] AShadyRaven@lemmy.zip 2 points 1 month ago

thats a good fucking point actually

its unreasonable to demand that your opponent follows the rules without doing so yourself.

im mad that my opponent has broken some of the rules, but if i start doing it too then what was the point