Technology

59179 readers

2207 users here now

This is a most excellent place for technology news and articles.

Our Rules

Follow the lemmy.world rules.
Only tech related content.
Be excellent to each another!
Mod approved content bots can post up to 10 articles per day.
Threads asking for personal tech support may be deleted.
Politics threads may be removed.
No memes allowed as posts, OK to post as comments.
Only approved bots from the list below, to ask if your bot can be added please contact us.
Check for duplicates before posting, duplicates may be removed

Approved Bots

founded 1 year ago

MODERATORS

340

JPEG is Dying - And that's a bad thing | 2kliksphilip (www.youtube.com)

submitted 3 months ago by ProdigalFrog@slrpnk.net to c/technology@lemmy.world

156 comments fedilink hide all child comments

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments

[–] rustydomino@lemmy.world 228 points 3 months ago (2 children)

Without jpeg compression artifacts how the hell are we supposed to know which memes are fresh and which memes are vintage???

[–] booly@sh.itjust.works 52 points 3 months ago (1 children)

I still think it's bullshit that 20-year-old photos now look the same as 20-second-old photos. Young people out there with baby pictures that look like they were taken yesterday.

[–] Plopp@lemmy.world 56 points 3 months ago (2 children)

We need a file format that degrades into black and white over time.

[–] tal 5 points 3 months ago (1 children)

The tradition has normally been to just have newer image formats and image-generation hardware and software that are more capable or higher fidelity so that the old stuff starts to look old in comparison to the new stuff.

[–] FierySpectre@lemmy.world 6 points 3 months ago (1 children)

What should be done is that every time a new format comes out all images in existence are re-encoded in that format. Hopefully that will cause artifacts, clearing everything up in terms of image age.

[–] mwguy@infosec.pub 1 points 3 months ago (1 children)

Slight tangent. But I've recently been pulling old home videos off of MiniDV tapes. And I've found that the ffmpeg dv1 decoder can correct several tape issues when re-encoding from dv1 to essentially any modern codec. So I've got like 3GB video files that look incredibly poor, but then I re-encode them into h264 files that look better than the original. It's baffling how well that works.

[–] FierySpectre@lemmy.world 1 points 3 months ago (1 children)

Wait, that's illegal

[–] mwguy@infosec.pub 1 points 3 months ago

lols

[–] III@lemmy.world 3 points 3 months ago

Could probably pull that off with meta information to determine the age of the photo.

[–] stoly@lemmy.world 3 points 3 months ago

lol nice one. It’s shocking how far we’ve come in quality.