this post was submitted on 08 Aug 2024
133 points (100.0% liked)
And Finally...
1065 readers
271 users here now
A place for odd or quirky world news stories.
Elsewhere in the Fediverse:
- !weirdnews@real.lemmy.fan
- !offbeat@lemmy.ca
- !nottheonion@lemmy.world
- !nottheonion@lemmy.ml
- !nottheonion@zerobytes.monster
- !aiop@lemmy.world
- !jingszo@lemmy.world
- !forteana@feddit.uk
- !strangetimes@lemmy.world
- !goodnews@feddit.uk
- !upliftingnews@lemmy.world
Rules:
- Be excellent to each other
- The Internet will resurface old "And finally..." material. Just mark it [VINTAGE]
founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
view the rest of the comments
Think about this for a second:
Take all the stupid shit you've done and said in your life. For argument's sake let's say you are absolutely average in terms of stupidity. That means 50% of people are more stupid than you.
And now imagine that again, but with your capacity for noticing your own stupidity. Obviously there's stuff you've missed. 50% of people will have a lower capacity to notice their own stupidity.
I think it's safe to say that the distribution is a bell curve. That means 50% of people are sort of average. But 25% will be significantly below that and 10% of the total will be severely stupid.
Safe to say stupidity is a powerful force in this world.
Then we are not talking even yet about mental disorders. Iirc schizophrenia has an occurrence of roughly 2%, and so does psychopathy. Of course not all people with shizo are unable to manage it, and not all psychos are evil. But it's still a lot of people!
And before anyone barges in saying "that's not how averages work", first of all you mean the, uh, mean – both the mean and the median are averages.
Second, intelligence probably follows a distribution that's reasonably close to Gaussian (at least on a smaller scale) just like more or less literally all biological variables do. And I don't mean IQ, but the general idea that cognitive performance – however the hell you define it – is going to vary from person to person and it's going to approximately follow a Gaussian curve. The upshot of this is that the median is probably very close to the mean.
Thanks for expanding on that. Can you say something about the difference between a bell curve and a gaussian curve?
Oh there's no difference, "bell curve" is just a more colloquial term for a normal distribution. "Normal distribution", "Gaussian distribution / curve" and "bell curve" all mean the same thing.
Wouldn't be math if there wasn't 736 different names for the same thing 😆
Oh sorry, I quick read over the first sentence and missed it. Long day yesterday!