Selfhosted

39224 readers

420 users here now

A place to share alternatives to popular online services that can be self-hosted without giving up privacy or locking you into a service you don't control.

Rules:

Be civil: we're here to support and learn from one another. Insults won't be tolerated. Flame wars are frowned upon.
No spam posting.
Posts have to be centered around self-hosting. There are other communities for discussing hardware or home computing. If it's not obvious why your post topic revolves around selfhosting, please include details to make it clear.
Don't duplicate the full text of your blog or github here. Just post the link for folks to click.
Submission headline should match the article title (don’t cherry-pick information from the title to fit your agenda).
No trolling.

Resources:

Any issues on the community? Report it using the report flag.

Questions? DM the mods!

founded 1 year ago

MODERATORS

HybridSarcasm@lemmy.world

HybridSarcasm@lemmy.hybridsarcasm.xyz

141

I spent ~$35 on new cables and my LAN speed increased 6x (sh.itjust.works)

submitted 1 month ago by anonymouse2@sh.itjust.works to c/selfhosted@lemmy.world

69 comments fedilink hide all child comments

After seeing that my wireless speeds were much faster than the speeds I was getting over Ethernet, I decided to invest in some new cables. I didn't know it before, but I saw while I was changing them out that my current cables were Cat 5e. While putting my network together, I had just been grabbing whatever cables I could find in my scrap drawers. Now I have Cat 8 cables and my speeds jumped from 7MB/s to an average of over 40MB/s. It's a much bigger improvement than I expected, especially for such a small investment.

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments

[–] catloaf@lemm.ee 4 points 1 month ago* (last edited 1 month ago) (1 children)

100m is the spec max. More than that, you need a powered repeater (i.e. baby switch). And you won't get 100m if you have bad cables.

I once saw a run in a cruise terminal, out of the cruise ship, down the gangway, along the terminal hallway, and through two more little switches just sitting on the floor next to an outlet. Not sure why they needed that run, but that's what they did and it worked.

[+] mosiacmango@lemm.ee 1 points 1 month ago (1 children)

[deleted]

[–] catloaf@lemm.ee 5 points 1 month ago (1 children)

Yes, I was agreeing with you. Although as I mentioned, it's technically 100m, which is 328 feet and one inch. And the spec also allows up to 5m of patch cable on each end, which I don't think I knew.

But that's the spec target. Low-quality cable, physical damage, or environmental conditions like interference may reduce the actual max in practice. You might be able to push it with cat6 and up, but the spec still only says 100m.

[–] mosiacmango@lemm.ee 4 points 1 month ago (1 children)

Copper core versus copper clad aluminum is going to matter here too. Both will claim to hit the spec, but you're more likely to get there with the expensive copper only.

[–] TCB13@lemmy.world 2 points 1 month ago

Yeah and don't forget good terminations. I've seen a lot of people not getting the speeds they could get just because they used cheap plugs/connectors.