this post was submitted on 10 Aug 2024
505 points (98.8% liked)

The Onion

4703 readers
997 users here now

The Onion

A place to share and discuss stories from The Onion, Clickhole, and other satire.

Great Satire Writing:

founded 3 years ago
MODERATORS
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] averyminya@beehaw.org 1 points 4 months ago (1 children)

That's the sort of question that requires distinguishing the amount of pollution you would make versus the thing you are blowing up. It may factor in if they will rebuild it and continue, or if they would not rebuild.

I would hazard a guess that in the majority of circumstances, blowing up a polluting company would be less pollutive than said company is, except for if they were to rebuild (since I would consider the resources for rebuild a necessity since you blew them up).

This is not an endorsement to explode anything, this is simply an analysis of factors about factories and their ecological terrorism.

[–] sparkle@lemm.ee 0 points 4 months ago

It was only a jest. Blowing up a factory would be, you know, bad. If people were in it.