this post was submitted on 11 Aug 2024
858 points (99.1% liked)

Mildly Interesting

17329 readers
3 users here now

This is for strictly mildly interesting material. If it's too interesting, it doesn't belong. If it's not interesting, it doesn't belong.

This is obviously an objective criteria, so the mods are always right. Or maybe mildly right? Ahh.. what do we know?

Just post some stuff and don't spam.

founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS
 

It's still not earning you money to spend electricity because you still have to pay the transfer fee which is around 6 cents / kWh but it's pretty damn cheap nevertheless, mostly because of the excess in wind energy.

Last winter because of a mistake it dropped down to negative 50 cents / kWh for few hours, averaging negative 20 cents for the entire day. People were literally earning money by spending electricity. Some were running electric heaters outside in the middle of the winter.

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] KillingTimeItself@lemmy.dbzer0.com 1 points 2 months ago (1 children)

thermal storage is kind of complicated and sucks a little bit, probably.

You can still do the heating thing, using your home as a thermal battery for example. You could also put a large thermal mass within your home, thousands of gallons of water (for example) directly integrating a thermal battery and optimally using it probably just isn't as viable as not worrying about it and doing something else.

[–] AA5B@lemmy.world 1 points 2 months ago* (last edited 2 months ago) (1 children)

It doesn’t have to be complicated, or the complexity is related to the use case. Does not need water or moving parts.

Consider a single radiator in a house. You only need storage sufficient to use that radiator for one day. And it doesn’t matter too much if it can’t cover extreme temperatures, as long as it is sufficient to cover peak prices most of the time

I finally found one. Why aren’t there choices like

Edit to circle back to the goal: now I can move toward cleaner energy by electrifying my house. I can save energy/money by using the most efficient heating technology. If there was thermal storage, I could save even more money with “time of use” metering and the utility can shift their load to make up for the peakiness of sources like solar. If I installed solar on my roof, I could potentially heat my house entirely with “free” energy

[–] KillingTimeItself@lemmy.dbzer0.com 1 points 2 months ago* (last edited 2 months ago) (1 children)

yeah, but if you're not doing it in a complicated manner you could just stick an IBC tote full of water in the middle of your home and it would provide a similar effect.

Personally i would probably just install a ground loop, and then use that to provide a source for heating and cooling, it's also very consistent year round, though if you live in an area of deep frost lines, or permafrost, it's probably going to be more exciting.

[–] AA5B@lemmy.world 1 points 2 months ago (1 children)

Unfortunately a ground loop can be expensive, especially for those of us in urban areas.

I read an analysis once that you could never make back the cost on energy saved. Whether or not that’s always true, I know I live in a high cost area with a yard that a drill couldn’t get to, cris-crossed with 80 years of utilities.

that's true, though to be fair i'd be the one installing it, i'm not paying other people to dig a hole lol.