7, easy spitball shooter
AA5B
Affordable Care Act is mostly still there, but
- the tax penalty for choosing no coverage was struck down in court, so more people are making this choice
- several states refused federal money to cover lower income
- republicans re-opened the door to junk policies that don’t provide meaningful coverage
Also the current administration is trying to
- replace support for state Medicaid programs with block grants that can be used to squeeze the state’s, who will reduce coverage
- repeal important features of ACA, like no refusal of treatment for pre-existing conditions, 100% coverage of routine care including immunizations
The bit about a tax penalty for absence of coverage is a bit much, does the government really need to kick someone when they’re down?
This was struck down in court years ago.
The “stick” was to encourage people to get coverage ahead of time or face the penalty. If they decided not to, the extra tax could help cover unpaid ER visits where they must be treated whether or not they can pay.
The “carrot” At the same time was reduced price insurance based on your income and expanded Medicaid coverage for people who couldn’t afford anything. This was paid for by the federal government but Medicaid is administered by the state: several Repugnancan states refused the money because their politicians were so set against providing free medical care
After the tax “stick” was struck down, coverage dropped without that penalty, and states where they refused the money left millions of lesser paid people without coverage . So yeah, we needed it
So musk heiling as he approaches naxiism is clearly unacceptable, but Pete Davidson heiling to satirize musk is fine?
Holy shit, I want this presidential debate. I want to decide between these two parties.
Right, this article is based on a flawed premise
To preserve America’s financial primacy, Trump must offer the world compelling reasons to remain within the dollar-based system.
But to all appearances Trump wants the opposite. Ending this system helps reinforce the isolationism that he seems to want, brings more control and wealth to him since everything can be based on bullying, kickbacks and deals, enables corruption, and lets Trump get short term wins. He can brag to his followers that he’s done these things, and they’ll love it.
… the enormous soft power it currently gives us over global finances and trade, the ability to write endless debt, an era of worldwide economic stability will be gone forever. But those aren’t things he values nor can explain to his cult
Here’s another: my family has a traditional Easter breakfast featuring “cheese”. But this “cheese” is eggs.
I don’t see anything like it online in the brief time I looked, but I imagine I have to some how break free of search results only containing contemporary and sponsored links and I just don’t have the time now
From an engineer at one of the legacy car manufacturers, they don’t want CarPlay 2 because it has privacy controls. They don’t want to give up so much access to the car, then have to access it over Apple APIs limited by privacy controls
I still like their technology. Hopefully they can figure out how to divest their owner
Sorry, there’s protests and we can’t protect you (especially if we turn our backs)?