this post was submitted on 12 Aug 2024
-10 points (40.7% liked)

Conservative

403 readers
36 users here now

A place to discuss pro-conservative stuff

  1. Be excellent to each other. Civility, No Racism, No Bigotry, No Slurs, No calls to violences, No namecalling, All that good stuff, follow lemm.ee's rules, follow the rules of your instance, etc.

  2. We are a Pro-Conservative forum. Posts must have a clear pro-conservative, or anti left-wing bias. We are interested in promoting conservatism and discussing things that might get ignored elsewhere. All sources are acceptable, however reputable sources with a reputation for factual reporting are preferred.

  3. Dissent is allowed in the comments, but try to be constructive; if you do not agree, then provide a reason which is backed up by references or a reasonable alternative interpretation of the provided facts. That means the left wing is welcome to state their opinions, but please keep it in good faith.

A polite request, not a rule, if you feel the need to report a comment, please don't reply to it.

founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] wintermute_oregon@lemm.ee -2 points 4 months ago (1 children)

That is the problem—too many unqualified people in the pipeline.

[–] sunzu@kbin.run 2 points 4 months ago (2 children)

The problem is that there are not enough well paying jobs to support this "educated" population esp with a ton of debt.

[–] intensely_human@lemm.ee -1 points 4 months ago (1 children)

China created a booming solar industry by subsidizing it heavily. We can do that too with other industries, and the subsidy can come in the form of trades education.

[–] sunzu@kbin.run 1 points 4 months ago

Obama subsidized solar too... What do we have to show for it?

Again, why should impoverished taxpayer subsidize the capex of property owner? In free entperise and private capitalist society why is we paying here?