this post was submitted on 14 Aug 2024
215 points (99.5% liked)

Games

32400 readers
990 users here now

Welcome to the largest gaming community on Lemmy! Discussion for all kinds of games. Video games, tabletop games, card games etc.

Weekly Threads:

What Are You Playing?

The Weekly Discussion Topic

Rules:

  1. Submissions have to be related to games

  2. No bigotry or harassment, be civil

  3. No excessive self-promotion

  4. Stay on-topic; no memes, funny videos, giveaways, reposts, or low-effort posts

  5. Mark Spoilers and NSFW

  6. No linking to piracy

More information about the community rules can be found here.

founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] bionicjoey@lemmy.ca 20 points 2 months ago (3 children)

Sounds like AI will be used to detect the shitty meme reviews. Honestly a great use of ML

[–] TachyonTele@lemm.ee 12 points 2 months ago (2 children)

There's a "not helpful" button under every review.

[–] bionicjoey@lemmy.ca 15 points 2 months ago (1 children)

It has never worked though, as far more people would vote helpful if something made them laugh (because people just think "more upvote")

[–] rand_alpha19@moist.catsweat.com 6 points 2 months ago

I dunno, that's why they added the "Funny" button and I see people use that all the time. Even the nearly-useless "Was this review helpful?" section on Amazon has some use to a customer making a purchasing decision.

If ML can be used to further help the issue, what's the problem? At least "AI" is being used for something that's actually trying to solve a practical issue in an attempt to improve the platform and not as an immediate way to extract maximum profit with minimum effort.

You could argue that Valve loves to automate its customer service to save money, and that would be valid and true, but I think improving the platform experience by trying to reduce (if not eliminate) unhelpful reviews is good.

[–] paraphrand@lemmy.world 6 points 2 months ago (1 children)

Seems like not enough people click those. We are taking about gamers here.

[–] TachyonTele@lemm.ee 3 points 2 months ago

Probably true.
Bionicjoey is right though, too. They're using AI to scale the not helpfulls and other review responses. Personally I'm all for the change.

[–] smeg@feddit.uk 4 points 2 months ago* (last edited 2 months ago)

and some machine learning algorithms to help scale the human judgement calls

I'm just glad they called it machine learning instead of "AI"

[–] ByteOnBikes@slrpnk.net 1 points 2 months ago (1 children)

You don't even need advanced AI.

[–] bionicjoey@lemmy.ca 1 points 2 months ago

I never said advanced. They say they are using ML as part of the process in the post