this post was submitted on 15 Aug 2024
31 points (97.0% liked)

History

23107 readers
135 users here now

Welcome to c/history! History is written by the posters.

c/history is a comm for discussion about history so feel free to talk and post about articles, books, videos, events or historical figures you find interesting

Please read the Hexbear Code of Conduct and remember...we're all comrades here.

Do not post reactionary or imperialist takes (criticism is fine, but don't pull nonsense from whatever chud author is out there).

When sharing historical facts, remember to provide credible souces or citations.

Historical Disinformation will be removed

founded 4 years ago
MODERATORS
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] radio_free_asgarthr@hexbear.net 8 points 3 months ago

My way of understanding this is that while the author is right in that Matt and Chris saying that the Thirty Years War was the "birthplace of Capitalism" is not literally correct in that it wasn't the case that there was feudalism before the war and capitalism after, or the transition and trends towards capitalism started in the war. But I think that what Matt and Chris meant, and why I think it is important to the formation of capitalism, is that it intensified and sped up many of the trends necessary for forming capitalism. Such as increasing financialization to fund the war, building up state power and apparatuses, the resultant secularization and rationalization of certain aspects of society laying groundwork for liberalism, the undermining of feudal institutions that would have stood in the way of capitalism, etc.