this post was submitted on 16 Aug 2024
691 points (98.9% liked)

Technology

59656 readers
2669 users here now

This is a most excellent place for technology news and articles.


Our Rules


  1. Follow the lemmy.world rules.
  2. Only tech related content.
  3. Be excellent to each another!
  4. Mod approved content bots can post up to 10 articles per day.
  5. Threads asking for personal tech support may be deleted.
  6. Politics threads may be removed.
  7. No memes allowed as posts, OK to post as comments.
  8. Only approved bots from the list below, to ask if your bot can be added please contact us.
  9. Check for duplicates before posting, duplicates may be removed

Approved Bots


founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS
 

archive

If you have the August 13, 2024—KB5041580 update. You're good.

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] pivot_root@lemmy.world 2 points 3 months ago (1 children)

Yeah, I butchered my answer by trying to simplify the process. I rewrote it in a hopefully more accurate but still simple to understand way.

[–] r00ty@kbin.life 3 points 3 months ago* (last edited 3 months ago) (1 children)

Yep, it's all good. In my opinion, IPv6 routers should just be dropping incoming connections by default. If you want to run services you give your machine a static IPv6 and open ports on that IP/port specifically. It's actually easier than NAT because you don't need to translate ports and each IP can use the same ports (multiple web servers on 80/443).

I do agree that the average joe is going to expect NAT level security by default and that would provide that.

[–] pivot_root@lemmy.world 3 points 3 months ago

I absolutely agree with you on all points here.

From a security perspective, allowing all incoming connections by default is unnecessarily exposing devices to a hostile environment. The average Joe isn't going to understand the risk unless somebody explained it as "it's like posting your home address on 4chan and hoping nobody manages to pick your front door lock," and they're likely never going to take advantage of the benefits that come from having their device be globally reachable.

Another benefit to not having to deal with NAT is that you can actually host services using the same protocol (e.g. HTTP) on multiple machines without having to resort to alternate port numbers or using a proxy with virtual host support.