Technology

34795 readers

220 users here now

This is the official technology community of Lemmy.ml for all news related to creation and use of technology, and to facilitate civil, meaningful discussion around it.

Ask in DM before posting product reviews or ads. All such posts otherwise are subject to removal.

Rules:

1: All Lemmy rules apply

2: Do not post low effort posts

3: NEVER post naziped*gore stuff

4: Always post article URLs or their archived version URLs as sources, NOT screenshots. Help the blind users.

5: personal rants of Big Tech CEOs like Elon Musk are unwelcome (does not include posts about their companies affecting wide range of people)

6: no advertisement posts unless verified as legitimate and non-exploitative/non-consumerist

7: crypto related posts, unless essential, are disallowed

founded 5 years ago

MODERATORS

MinutePhrase@lemmy.ml

128

Naomi Wu and the Silence That Speaks Volumes (www.hackingbutlegal.com)

submitted 1 year ago by nix@merv.news to c/technology@lemmy.ml

18 comments fedilink hide all child comments

After the last post publicly by Naomi Wu being

“Ok for those of you that haven't figured it out I got my wings clipped and they weren't gentle about it- so there's not going to be much posting on social media anymore and only on very specific subjects. I can leave but Kaidi can't so we're just going to follow the new rules and that's that. Nothing personal if I don't like and reply like I used to. I'll be focusing on the store and the occasional video. Thanks for understanding, it was fun while it lasted”

Naomi Wu mentions briefly on her silencing and how she is not nearly as safe as she was before now that it’s obvious to the Chinese government her disappearance won’t cause an uproar of bad press making China look bad.

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments

[–] Faceman2K23@discuss.tchncs.de 1 points 1 year ago (1 children)

That's why I say arguably.. I don't support doxxing, but this was an eye-for-an-eye situation as they must have known the damage they could potentially cause.

[–] schroedingershat@lemmy.world 3 points 1 year ago

Her response was unable to do nearly as much damage as the article. The stakes were much lower for the vice editor and her platform had much lower reach.