this post was submitted on 19 Aug 2024
426 points (92.8% liked)

Linux

47337 readers
1122 users here now

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

Linux is a family of open source Unix-like operating systems based on the Linux kernel, an operating system kernel first released on September 17, 1991 by Linus Torvalds. Linux is typically packaged in a Linux distribution (or distro for short).

Distributions include the Linux kernel and supporting system software and libraries, many of which are provided by the GNU Project. Many Linux distributions use the word "Linux" in their name, but the Free Software Foundation uses the name GNU/Linux to emphasize the importance of GNU software, causing some controversy.

Rules

Related Communities

Community icon by Alpár-Etele Méder, licensed under CC BY 3.0

founded 5 years ago
MODERATORS
 

Finally, another web engine is being developed to compete with Chromium and Firefox (Gecko), and they're also working on a browser that will use it.

Here's the maintainer talking about the current state of the project, and a demo of the current functionality

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] Aatube@kbin.melroy.org 52 points 1 month ago (3 children)

Sounds fun, but I wish there were more people who'd invest in making Firefox's Gecko more easy to use (stretch goal: revive Proton, which is Electron but Firefox) instead of pushing a ton of effort into inventing a new thing.

That said, this is coming from SerenityOS (specifically, the founder and basically the entire community concentrating on building its browser instead of hacking the OS, resulting in a split), so I understand that it might be a lot harder to port large codebases to a new OS instead of than starting a new one.

Edit: It's Positron, not Proton

[–] IrritableOcelot@beehaw.org 25 points 1 month ago* (last edited 1 month ago) (1 children)

Well we wouldn't want Proton, it would be 2000x less lightweight than electron! /s

It seems to me that Tauri is maybe a better direction to invest resources in than a direct electron-but-Firefox. Its lighter weight and better sandboxed, and can presumably be configured to run with a Gecko engine instead of a chromium-based webview. I have no idea its status, but geckoview does seem to exist.

[–] mexicancartel@lemmy.dbzer0.com 6 points 1 month ago (1 children)

Ah shit we need photon. Light as light itself

[–] ReversalHatchery@beehaw.org 2 points 4 weeks ago (1 children)

Proton and photon is just the Firefox browser's GUI style. Proton is the previous one, photon is the current one where everything is bigger and curly.

[–] Aatube@kbin.melroy.org 1 points 4 weeks ago

Yeah, I meant Positron, my bad

[–] deafboy@lemmy.world 4 points 1 month ago (2 children)

Sounds like fun, but I wish we had a real multiplatform GUI framework that does not look like ass and does not perform like ass, so we can put the whole shameful electron era behind us.

[–] amju_wolf@pawb.social 8 points 1 month ago (1 children)

That's never going to happen, and the reasons are twofold:

Brands want to push their own style on people, to make themselves recognizable, and to push their ideas about UX to their users (because they obviously know better than the OS/DE/compositor/whatever people).

It's easier and cheaper to build a web app, because there are so many web developers. It also usually allows you to give an "app" to people who want that, while giving a (perhaps somewhat limited) browser version to everyone else, reaching the maximum amount of users while maintaining only a single codebase and keeping everything more or less cohesive and looking the same.

[–] balder1993@programming.dev 1 points 4 weeks ago* (last edited 4 weeks ago) (1 children)

Brands want to push their own style on people, to make themselves recognizable, and to push their ideas about UX to their users

That’s not a universal behavior though. There’s so many utilities and simpler apps made by indie developers or smaller companies that don’t care about this.

[–] amju_wolf@pawb.social 1 points 4 weeks ago

That's technically true, but the apps "everyone" has are the opposite to that, and people are used to it and don't really seem to complain. So if Facebook, Tiktok, Twitter, Amazon, Spotify and Aliexpress each do their own (garbage) thing, it shows other brands they can do that too, and they kinda ruin it for everyone. Basically the apps you spend most time in are probably like that, and it's a shitty experience.

[–] theneverfox@pawb.social 1 points 4 weeks ago

It just makes too much sense... The only way to get past electron is a better electron. Or just fix electron

We've been going after this concept for decades now. That's what java swing was supposed to be, what python gtlk was supposed to be, and I'm sure there were others before that and there's been a hell of a lot since then

It's all trade-offs between flexibility, ease of use, and performance. Also between maintenance cost, portability, and existing library support

Electron is a good compromise. The execution could be better, but it's come a long way. There is no one size fits all solution, but there are some decent options that handle that compromise differently

[–] monobot@lemmy.ml 1 points 4 weeks ago (1 children)

These people started it and are doing it for fun.

Fixing few decades of technical debt is not fun and a big question would be if their code would even be considered for existing engines.

It us so much fin it already has over 1000 contributors. It got us 1k more people that understand browsers deeply. I think that's a huge win whatever happens with browser itself

[–] Aatube@kbin.melroy.org 1 points 4 weeks ago

You don’t have to fix technical debt to just incorporate the engine unless you’re porting it to an entirely new operating system.