this post was submitted on 21 Aug 2024
126 points (95.0% liked)

News

22876 readers
5101 users here now

Welcome to the News community!

Rules:

1. Be civil


Attack the argument, not the person. No racism/sexism/bigotry. Good faith argumentation only. This includes accusing another user of being a bot or paid actor. Trolling is uncivil and is grounds for removal and/or a community ban.


2. All posts should contain a source (url) that is as reliable and unbiased as possible and must only contain one link.


Obvious right or left wing sources will be removed at the mods discretion. We have an actively updated blocklist, which you can see here: https://lemmy.world/post/2246130 if you feel like any website is missing, contact the mods. Supporting links can be added in comments or posted seperately but not to the post body.


3. No bots, spam or self-promotion.


Only approved bots, which follow the guidelines for bots set by the instance, are allowed.


4. Post titles should be the same as the article used as source.


Posts which titles don’t match the source won’t be removed, but the autoMod will notify you, and if your title misrepresents the original article, the post will be deleted. If the site changed their headline, the bot might still contact you, just ignore it, we won’t delete your post.


5. Only recent news is allowed.


Posts must be news from the most recent 30 days.


6. All posts must be news articles.


No opinion pieces, Listicles, editorials or celebrity gossip is allowed. All posts will be judged on a case-by-case basis.


7. No duplicate posts.


If a source you used was already posted by someone else, the autoMod will leave a message. Please remove your post if the autoMod is correct. If the post that matches your post is very old, we refer you to rule 5.


8. Misinformation is prohibited.


Misinformation / propaganda is strictly prohibited. Any comment or post containing or linking to misinformation will be removed. If you feel that your post has been removed in error, credible sources must be provided.


9. No link shorteners.


The auto mod will contact you if a link shortener is detected, please delete your post if they are right.


10. Don't copy entire article in your post body


For copyright reasons, you are not allowed to copy an entire article into your post body. This is an instance wide rule, that is strictly enforced in this community.

founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] Linkerbaan@lemmy.world 2 points 4 weeks ago (2 children)

Harris already said no weapons embargo on israel. There's no reason to be optimistic.

[–] givesomefucks@lemmy.world 5 points 4 weeks ago (2 children)

Pretty sure that was one of Biden's aides that said she wouldn't?

But there's a lot of room between the current situation and "full weapons embargo" for improvement

[–] aleph@lemm.ee 3 points 4 weeks ago (1 children)

An arms embargo in some form is literally the only leverage the US has that could change Netanyahu's mind, at this stage. Personally, I don't think Kamala has the guts for it.

[–] givesomefucks@lemmy.world 0 points 3 weeks ago

For a full on embargo?

Almost definitely not

But they can limit it to just missile defense and such.

That's not a full weapon embargo, but it's an embargo on the worst items and frankly if they do t get that shit from us, their only option is China, and China would know that and charge them out the ass for anything. Which means they get less than everything.

Shit is rarely black or white. But with Biden they had a blank check, anything they wanted and Biden went around Congress for an arm's "sale" already. Which frankly is a straight up war crime and violates US and international law, but it looks like some people are above the law despite what Biden said.

[–] Linkerbaan@lemmy.world 2 points 4 weeks ago* (last edited 4 weeks ago) (1 children)

No the top Kamala aide said it. No weapons embargo means there's no chance of any embargo.

There's a weird thing going on where any negative news about Kamala is said by an aide instead of Kamala.

Her track record is consistent with support for the Genocide as well. Especially this 2019 article explains a lot

‘More AIPAC Than J Street’: Kamala Harris Runs to the Right on Foreign Policy

In her very first foreign policy vote in January 2017, for instance, Harris sided with President Trump in criticizing the outgoing President Obama’s refusal to veto an otherwise-unanimous, very modest, and largely symbolic UN Security Council resolution on Israeli settlements. Among other things, that resolution reiterated previous Security Council calls for Israel to stop expanding its illegal settlements in the occupied West Bank, which violate the Fourth Geneva Convention and a landmark ruling by the International Court of Justice.

[–] givesomefucks@lemmy.world 3 points 4 weeks ago (1 children)

I googled it

There was an anonymous aide who said something, then National Security Advisor to the VP said they wouldn't do a full embargo that would leave an opening for Iran to attack.

https://www.motherjones.com/politics/2024/08/dnc-arms-embargo-uncommitted-pledge-petition-kamala-harris/

But they also said Biden wasn't stepping aside for any reason right up until the second Biden stepped down.

That article I linked is a good read, there's a lot of pressure from within the party for an embargo. And both Harris and Wall's are open to discussions, and have already been having them.

They're not perfect, but they're open to a dialog. It's a huge improvement from Biden.

They could still drastically limit what types of weapons get "sold" to Israel and what quantities.

Put it on Israel:

Save these for defense or use them for a genocide, but we're not just giving you everything you ask for.

If Bibi uses them for genocide and leaves Israel open to an attack from an actual country with a functional government and military, that's probably the fastest way to get Bibi out of power. There's already been huge protests in Israel for months calling for him to step down. And he's delaying an election he's almost guaranteed to lose.

It just doesn't take as much as you seem to think to end this.

[–] Linkerbaan@lemmy.world 2 points 4 weeks ago

Harris Doesn’t Support Arms Embargo on Israel, a Top Adviser Says

Vice President Kamala Harris’s national security adviser said on Thursday that she did not support an arms embargo on Israel, laying out one of her first firm policy positions since becoming the Democratic nominee on how she would approach the war in Gaza. The adviser, Phil Gordon, said on social media on Thursday morning that Ms. Harris would “always ensure Israel is able to defend itself against Iran and Iran-backed terrorist groups.” He added: “She does not support an arms embargo on Israel. She will continue to work to protect civilians in Gaza and to uphold international humanitarian law.”

The article you linked has great language but effectively means absolutely nothing. Empty words are the same thing we've heard from Biden the last 10 months.

[–] CeruleanRuin@lemmings.world 1 points 3 weeks ago

Harris is in an awkward position where even if she disagrees vehemently with the Biden administration's policies, she can't really do or say anything about it because she's still a part of that administration. Undermining her boss right now would only cause a backlash from all directions that would be far more damaging than simply sitting on it until after the election.

A President Elect Harris will have far more leeway to steer policy on such a delicate issue than a Vice President Harris ever could.