Science Fiction

13567 readers

1 users here now

Welcome to /c/ScienceFiction

December book club canceled. Short stories instead!

We are a community for discussing all things Science Fiction. We want this to be a place for members to discuss and share everything they love about Science Fiction, whether that be books, movies, TV shows and more. Please feel free to take part and help our community grow.

Be civil: disagreements happen, but that doesn’t provide the right to personally insult others.
Posts or comments that are homophobic, transphobic, racist, sexist, ableist, or advocating violence will be removed.
Spam, self promotion, trolling, and bots are not allowed
Put (Spoilers) in the title of your post if you anticipate spoilers.
Please use spoiler tags whenever commenting a spoiler in a non-spoiler thread.

Lemmy World Rules

founded 1 year ago

MODERATORS

Tenthrow@lemmy.world

102

Is Dune part 2 worth watching? (lemmy.world)

submitted 2 months ago by cetvrti_magi@lemmy.world to c/sciencefiction@lemmy.world

56 comments fedilink hide all child comments

I just finished part 1 and, well, I'm kinda disappointed. It's not bad, I think it's actually pretty solid, but compared to the book it's much worse in terms of story progression and characters. Some parts felt really rushed. I didn't expect it to be better than the book, but I still expected better adaptation considering that (at least as far as I know) it was well received and I knew that it didn't adapt whole book so I expected it to don't skip too much. Is part 2 any better?

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments

[–] julietOscarEcho@sh.itjust.works 25 points 2 months ago (2 children)

It's impossible to adapt, see all previous adaptations. I think you've pretty accurately summed up the shortcomings of the medium for that story. Watch the movie to marvel at the setting brought to life with a nice soundscape, ideally see it on a big screen. If you read the book you'll have some attachment to the characters and universe anyway so pacing and skipped detail shouldn't be too much of a problem for you. Just don't expect it to be perfect. IMO the second part is a bit stronger, maybe because the scope is tighter.

[–] AwesomeLowlander@sh.itjust.works 2 points 2 months ago (1 children)

IDK, the mini series honestly did a pretty good job staying faithful to the source. Too bad they didn't have a bigger budget is all

[–] Illuminostro@lemmy.world 2 points 2 months ago (1 children)

And the worst costume design ever committed to film.

[–] AwesomeLowlander@sh.itjust.works 2 points 2 months ago

Hey now, the hats were amazing!

[–] pixeltree@lemmy.blahaj.zone 1 points 2 months ago (1 children)

Having not read the books but watched someone's very long YouTube video about them, I think the new movies did a pretty darn good job of doing a ton of crazy world building without being 3 hours of exposition. I certainly didn't understand everything but I got the rough idea of pretty much everything and I think they did a really good job in particular of relaying the "mind over machines" motif. Certainly not a perfect adaptation but I think it's a damn good example of one

[–] julietOscarEcho@sh.itjust.works 2 points 2 months ago

I really enjoyed them too, which I guess I could have made clearer. I felt like my enjoyment was heightened by my knowledge and nostalgia for the books, but interesting yto hear another positive perspective without that aspect. I suppose what I'm trying to say is not that they aren't or can't be good, but that they aren't and can't be a faithful and complete adaptation.

The world building aspect is why I tend to think TV series are generally the better screen medium for scifi than feature film, having more space to explore the causes and consequences of a fantasy premise. But yeah, I love a spectacle. The setting and soundscape of the new movies are top. Like I can't rember feelings like that in the cinema since Lord of the rings.