julietOscarEcho

joined 1 year ago
MODERATOR OF
 

Really mixed bag play wise but will remember that one for a long time. Gary's eyes on the back to back sacks. Watson coming good and a fantastic finish. Phew!

[–] julietOscarEcho@sh.itjust.works 2 points 3 days ago (1 children)

Agreed, de facto, budget cuts have been and would be racist.

Fiscal conservatism actually does mean something though. Like you could imagine a left leaning fiscally conservative government that maintained a balanced budget by raising taxes on corps and the wealthy. That would be basically fine (though I think on balance not as good as running a modest deficit to fund nice policy). If you just go, yeah no those words are henceforth no-bueno, aren't you just buying into their doublespeak?

[–] julietOscarEcho@sh.itjust.works 12 points 4 days ago* (last edited 4 days ago) (3 children)

Trumps "platform" was by any measure or definition less fiscally conservative than kamala. Pretty sure the reps left fiscal conservatism in the wasteland with Romney.

The new bullshit dogma for the right wing is "growth". But I don't think the Trump parade really even tried to explain that was the goal, or really any coherent economic policy.

Edit: the article seems to make the same point. That previously at least outwardly normal people have gone off the deep end.

Only has a fraction of the strategy and deck building of the actual TCG. Just seems like the usual mobile garbage to me (stamina mechanics, a million currency types, pay to win), shame.

Quick Google suggests healthcare costs for obese people are <50% higher than non-obese and the US has 15-30% more obesity than these countries. So maybe 15% at most of the 100% higher cost per capita of healthcare is obesity related. The killer for me for that hypothesis is that within the set of countries with normal healthcare costs, there's huge variation in obesity (10% in France to 30%in ireland) with limited variation in cost.

Maybe the life expectancy side does have more to do with obesity?

"As usual with those sorts of memes, the numbers are completely wrong. European nations spend around 11-12% of GDP on healthcare vs about 17% for the US. So you'd likely pay significantly less (about 30% less)"

Dis you?

It must really suck to be a good hearted doctor in that system. When every incentive is to push unnecessary interventions and you must encounter patients that can't or won't accept your help because it would ruin them or their family financially.

[–] julietOscarEcho@sh.itjust.works 38 points 2 weeks ago* (last edited 2 weeks ago) (5 children)

Really USA, how does anyone pretend this is OK?

[–] julietOscarEcho@sh.itjust.works 1 points 2 weeks ago* (last edited 2 weeks ago) (2 children)

OK cool, well if "someone is wrong on this Internet" is more important to you than making a case for a better health are system (that I note you have spent 0 energy on) I think I'm done. Thanks for the entertainment of "$5k per person is 30% cheaper than $10k" though, that was a good one.

[–] julietOscarEcho@sh.itjust.works 1 points 2 weeks ago (4 children)

So when the meme was wrong about 5% vs 20% it was "outright lying" but when you were shown to be wrong about your 30% you just continue on your high horse. Cool beans.

Not a political issue for me anymore thank goodness. Lived in the US for a while but very glad that public health is available for everyone where I live now (as is literally everyone else I know).

I mean private healthcare is strictly worse for everyone except business owners (and doctors without morals I guess). So that's my best guess at your motivation, but please correct me. Why?

[–] julietOscarEcho@sh.itjust.works 2 points 2 weeks ago* (last edited 2 weeks ago) (6 children)

"30% less" 😂 US GDP (it said % of pay, but let's play your game) per capita is 1.5x or more European countries, so try at least 50% less. It's a meme, it's not meant to be accurate, but if you're going to be a pedant at least be right.

Not to mention the lower cost is like 3rd on the list of reasons why public health care is amazing. Why you our here shilling for big business pal?

"needs to be a balance" this is exactly the problem right. There is zero balance, to the extent that even projects that set out to be operated for the benefit of humanity (open AI, looking at you) get converted to just enrich the already ludicrously wealthy. The corporation is a lever to concentrate wealth. Really important projects being closely controlled by billionaires is the natural consequence of this. Their unfettered power puts us all at risk from their capriciousness.

Yup. Betfair in the UK didn't close or settle their 2020 market for months, even though the terms of the market were about who was declared winner on election night, and were long since met with 100% certainty. That was some very easy money.

 

Even on the TD he doesn't have a good handle. He cannot be getting this many targets going forward unless he shows he remembers how to catch.

 

Someone post updates on love when they see something solid? Backup is a fuckin wasteland, we'll need to sign someone right? Who's actually on the trade block?

 

I don't watch college so I don't have much context. I terms of positions taken it seemed kinda obvious with the departures on the line and the move to 4-3. Hopefully we got some impact guys, but anyone willing to bet on them before we see them in action?

 

Yuck twitter. But:

 

Winnable rest of schedule so decent shot at a wildcard from what I can tell. Cowboys are nailed on. Vikings see the lions twice so hopefully out regardless of result against us. So probably two slots between us, saints, bucs and hawks for remaining 2 wildcards.

Not counting on beating the real contenders but some post season experience for Love would be great. We shot ourselves in the foot on draft capital though.

 

Last few games love looking like the real deal no? Wicks and reed coming through as viable targets really helping him out.

 

But I want to see some RUNS tonight. Go pack go.

 

Probably no one here will learn anything from this, but it's a well written article with a couple of curveballs for me, like over half of NFL teams have threatened to leave for LA!

1
Holy hell (sh.itjust.works)
submitted 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago) by julietOscarEcho@sh.itjust.works to c/packers@sh.itjust.works
 

What a roller coaster. I don't remember emotions like that since rodgers coming back on against the bears after injury.

 

I know everyone's down on the scheme but I really think if the pass rush comes through it could plug the deficiency against the deep ball and give us an above average unit this year.

What's our weakness? MLB as usual? Strong safety/ slot corner?

view more: next ›