this post was submitted on 21 Aug 2024

160 points (98.2% liked)

Linux

5191 readers

37 users here now

A community for everything relating to the linux operating system

Also check out !linux_memes@programming.dev

Original icon base courtesy of lewing@isc.tamu.edu and The GIMP

founded 1 year ago

MODERATORS

Ategon@programming.dev

anzo@programming.dev

dwraf_of_ignorance@programming.dev

160

“Something has gone seriously wrong,” dual-boot systems warn after Microsoft update (arstechnica.com)

submitted 2 months ago by Blaze@lemmy.zip to c/linux@programming.dev

42 comments fedilink hide all child comments

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments

[–] gravitas_deficiency@sh.itjust.works 2 points 2 months ago* (last edited 2 months ago)

Way to miss the nuance lol

What I’m saying is that if a system claims to rigorously validate code that runs in a particular sensitive domain (here, ring 0), it should actually rigorously validate code. This was a process failure at the end of the day.