this post was submitted on 27 Aug 2024
78 points (97.6% liked)

Games

16403 readers
807 users here now

Video game news oriented community. No NanoUFO is not a bot :)

Posts.

  1. News oriented content (general reviews, previews or retrospectives allowed).
  2. Broad discussion posts (preferably not only about a specific game).
  3. No humor/memes etc..
  4. No affiliate links
  5. No advertising.
  6. No clickbait, editorialized, sensational titles. State the game in question in the title. No all caps.
  7. No self promotion.
  8. No duplicate posts, newer post will be deleted unless there is more discussion in one of the posts.
  9. No politics.

Comments.

  1. No personal attacks.
  2. Obey instance rules.
  3. No low effort comments(one or two words, emoji etc..)
  4. Please use spoiler tags for spoilers.

My goal is just to have a community where people can go and see what new game news is out for the day and comment on it.

Other communities:

Beehaw.org gaming

Lemmy.ml gaming

lemmy.ca pcgaming

founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS
nanoUFO@sh.itjust.works
78
Oh dear, Concord's launch numbers are even worse than 2023's disastrous Gollum, so where does that leave PlayStation and its push for live-service? (www.vg247.com)
submitted 3 weeks ago by nanoUFO@sh.itjust.works to c/games@sh.itjust.works
12 comments fedilink hide all child comments
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] BumpingFuglies@lemmy.zip 70 points 3 weeks ago (4 children)

The obvious answer is to abandon GaaS as a concept and focus making more great single player games like the ones that put Playstation into a clear lead in this generation of the console wars.

However, we've seen that a massive failure in the space isn't enough to deter the truly greedy coughWBcough, so who knows?

[–] Fubarberry@sopuli.xyz 36 points 3 weeks ago (2 children)

WB doubled down, after Suicide Squad failed horribly and Hogwarts Legacy sold fantastically they decided they needed to stop making games like Hogwarts to focus on more live service games.

[–] Jumi@lemmy.world 5 points 3 weeks ago

Peak shareholders moment

[–] Kiwi_fella@lemmy.world 1 points 3 weeks ago

Alan Sugar needs to teach this lot some basics of selling.

[–] ampersandrew@lemmy.world 10 points 3 weeks ago

I love multiplayer games, and I want more of them. But I don't want live service games. Multiplayer is not synonymous with live service, and single player is not its opposite.

[–] conciselyverbose@sh.itjust.works 5 points 3 weeks ago* (last edited 3 weeks ago)

The nature of needing a community is definitely something that impedes purchases, too. People recognizing that something has a bad reputation are less likely to buy/try it.

All games have some financial reliance on the hype cycle, but if I buy a single player game and no one else does, I still have my game. If I buy Concord and no one else does, I'm going to be holding the bag when it gets abandoned.

[–] 100@fedia.io 2 points 3 weeks ago

think they still have a few shitty games as service to go before they run out

cough marathon