this post was submitted on 27 Aug 2024
216 points (97.4% liked)

World News

38554 readers
2598 users here now

A community for discussing events around the World

Rules:

We ask that the users report any comment or post that violate the rules, to use critical thinking when reading, posting or commenting. Users that post off-topic spam, advocate violence, have multiple comments or posts removed, weaponize reports or violate the code of conduct will be banned.

All posts and comments will be reviewed on a case-by-case basis. This means that some content that violates the rules may be allowed, while other content that does not violate the rules may be removed. The moderators retain the right to remove any content and ban users.


Lemmy World Partners

News !news@lemmy.world

Politics !politics@lemmy.world

World Politics !globalpolitics@lemmy.world


Recommendations

For Firefox users, there is media bias / propaganda / fact check plugin.

https://addons.mozilla.org/en-US/firefox/addon/media-bias-fact-check/

founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] TranscendentalEmpire@lemm.ee 44 points 3 weeks ago (4 children)

They've migrated to a wartime economy, which gives you a lot of command over the economy. They're currently doing a careful dance of increasing their money supply, while trying to stabilize inflation using what foreign currency reserves and income they have.

The biggest thing keeping their economy going is the price of oil, which is hovering around 80-90$ a barrel. The vast majority of this is being gobbled up by the government via their national wealth fund.

So long as heightened domestic productivity is maintained for the war, and the price of oil is higher than 60-65$ they could retain solvency for years.

A real economic collapse won't be felt until the price of oil bottoms out, or if they attempt to transition out of a war time economy.

[–] rbesfe@lemmy.ca 30 points 3 weeks ago (1 children)

The key point about wartime economies is that they don't actually increase quality of life for the people, even if everyone is making a decent salary (by Russia standards anyway).

Public infrastructure in Russia was already struggling before the war, I can only imagine the state it'll be in in 10 years

[–] TranscendentalEmpire@lemm.ee 15 points 3 weeks ago

The key point about wartime economies is that they don't actually increase quality of life for the people

That's debatable dependent on the situation and the timeframe you're looking at. You'll usually see an increase in domestic production and consumption as a general by-product of lower unemployment.

However, they are still going to run into the guns vs butter problem. Unless they actually seize Ukraine and extract more wealth from it than they spent acquiring it, their investments into military infrastructure are going to be losses.

[–] Plopp@lemmy.world 14 points 3 weeks ago (1 children)

I looked at one of those ship monitoring sites and there was almost a continous string of oil tankers going to and from St. Petersburg, so I'd say they're probably selling a fuck ton of oil still.

[–] Erasmus@lemmy.world 7 points 3 weeks ago (1 children)

Would be a shame if something bad happened to fuck up that port and made it, unusable. 🤔

[–] Plopp@lemmy.world 14 points 3 weeks ago

Someone quick call Ever Given and her sister ships to come and accidentally clog the passages around Denmark.

[–] fuckingkangaroos@lemm.ee 2 points 3 weeks ago

migrated

A gentle way to describe it.

[–] addictedtochaos@lemm.ee 2 points 3 weeks ago

i think the real problem is manpower, and essential materials like electronics.