this post was submitted on 18 Aug 2023
35 points (100.0% liked)

Technology

37730 readers
655 users here now

A nice place to discuss rumors, happenings, innovations, and challenges in the technology sphere. We also welcome discussions on the intersections of technology and society. If it’s technological news or discussion of technology, it probably belongs here.

Remember the overriding ethos on Beehaw: Be(e) Nice. Each user you encounter here is a person, and should be treated with kindness (even if they’re wrong, or use a Linux distro you don’t like). Personal attacks will not be tolerated.

Subcommunities on Beehaw:

This community's icon was made by Aaron Schneider, under the CC-BY-NC-SA 4.0 license.

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
alyaza@beehaw.org
TheRtRevKaiser@beehaw.org
gyrfalcon@beehaw.org
rs5th@beehaw.org
Los@beehaw.org
coldredlight@beehaw.org
SemioticStandard@beehaw.org
TheRtRevKaiser@kbin.social
remington@beehaw.org
35
Google Tests an A.I. Assistant That Offers Life Advice (web.archive.org)
submitted 1 year ago by 0x815@feddit.de to c/technology@beehaw.org
10 comments fedilink hide all child comments
 

The tech giant is evaluating tools that would use artificial intelligence to perform tasks that some of its researchers have said should be avoided.

Google’s A.I. safety experts had said in December that users could experience “diminished health and well-being” and a “loss of agency” if they took life advice from A.I. They had added that some users who grew too dependent on the technology could think it was sentient. And in March, when Google launched Bard, it said the chatbot was barred from giving medical, financial or legal advice. Bard shares mental health resources with users who say they are experiencing mental distress.

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] MediaActivist@beehaw.org 6 points 1 year ago

Most potential technology will of course be acontextual and lacking any kind of critique of capitalism. I witness people I know make all kind of "wise" decisions based on career expectations or ambition and definitions of "success," and they're actually really miserable yet can't seem to recognise why. I'm unconvinced AI developed by capitalist companies would provide healthier perspectives. Heck, even humans fall short in such roles as counselling, when they lack class consciousness or a critique of neoliberalism. AI probably doesn't stand much more chance.