Privacy

31912 readers

492 users here now

A place to discuss privacy and freedom in the digital world.

Privacy has become a very important issue in modern society, with companies and governments constantly abusing their power, more and more people are waking up to the importance of digital privacy.

In this community everyone is welcome to post links and discuss topics related to privacy.

Some Rules

Posting a link to a website containing tracking isn't great, if contents of the website are behind a paywall maybe copy them into the post
Don't promote proprietary software
Try to keep things on topic
If you have a question, please try searching for previous discussions, maybe it has already been answered
Reposts are fine, but should have at least a couple of weeks in between so that the post can reach a new audience
Be nice :)

Related communities

Chat rooms

[Matrix/Element]Dead
Discord

much thanks to @gary_host_laptop for the logo design :)

founded 5 years ago

MODERATORS

What is the best way to encrypt a USB drive that can be used on multiple OSes? (self.privacy)

submitted 2 months ago* (last edited 2 months ago) by ninjaturtle to c/privacy@lemmy.ml

29 comments fedilink hide all child comments

Not sure is this is the best place to post this question, but wondering what is the best way to encrypt a usb drive?

Want to be able to carry an encrypted flash drive with me but also be able to unlock it, if possible, on various OSes. Preferably with some kind of portable software. Something similar to the method that comes with the Kingston Data Traveler USB drives.

Edit: Seems like Veracrypt and Cryptomator are the best options to check out. Thank everyone!

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments

[–] Deconceptualist@lemm.ee 11 points 2 months ago* (last edited 2 months ago) (2 children)

This, except consider exFAT. It's more modern than FAT32 but also widely compatible.

https://www.howtogeek.com/235596/whats-the-difference-between-fat32-exfat-and-ntfs/

[–] Novi@sh.itjust.works 7 points 2 months ago (1 children)

I would not just default to exfat because it is "newer," it does have compatibility issues on non-windows systems. The implementations differ wildly.

[–] Deconceptualist@lemm.ee 2 points 2 months ago

Back when I used Windows, it worked fine for me out of the box between Win7 and both Ubuntu-based and Arch-based Linux distros 🤷

[–] PM_Your_Nudes_Please@lemmy.world 1 points 2 months ago

I have had major issues with exFAT across a variety of platforms. But I also work with a bunch of niche gear. But my point is simply that being widely compatible isn’t the same as being fully compatible. And OP was asking for the best way to reach the widest compatibility. That calls for FAT32, even if it has issues with things like file size.