this post was submitted on 29 Aug 2024
1036 points (97.9% liked)

Technology

59422 readers
3001 users here now

This is a most excellent place for technology news and articles.


Our Rules


  1. Follow the lemmy.world rules.
  2. Only tech related content.
  3. Be excellent to each another!
  4. Mod approved content bots can post up to 10 articles per day.
  5. Threads asking for personal tech support may be deleted.
  6. Politics threads may be removed.
  7. No memes allowed as posts, OK to post as comments.
  8. Only approved bots from the list below, to ask if your bot can be added please contact us.
  9. Check for duplicates before posting, duplicates may be removed

Approved Bots


founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] chris@l.roofo.cc 39 points 2 months ago (4 children)

Most people don't want to pay for AI. So they are building stuff that costs a lot for a market that is not willing to pay for it. It is mostly a gimmick for most people.

[–] DragonConsort@pawb.social 28 points 2 months ago (2 children)

And like, it's not even a good gimmick. It's a serious labour issue because the primary intent behind a lot of AI has always been to just phase out workers.

I'm all for ending work through technological advancement and universal income, but this definitely wasn't going to get us that, so....

Well, why would I support something that mostly just threatens people's livelihoods and gives even more power to the 0.1%?

[–] nnullzz@lemmy.world 4 points 2 months ago (1 children)

And then on top of that, if they phase workers out without some kind of universal income, how the hell do the corporate overlords expect us to have money to fuel their greed?

[–] KillerTofu@lemmy.world 2 points 2 months ago

Government subsidies!

[–] cm0002@lemmy.world 5 points 2 months ago

True for the consumer side, but I'd be willing to bet that a decent chunk of that money that giant corporations burned funded some serious research on AI that can go on to actually useful science things

[–] Grandwolf319@sh.itjust.works 2 points 2 months ago

Why don’t companies get this? If you make something free in the beginning, people will become conditioned that it’s not worth paying for.

[–] D_Air1@lemmy.ml 1 points 2 months ago

Exactly. I have used quite a few products and my thoughts have been. That's cool, but when would I ever need this? The few useful usecases I have for it could use a small local model for very specific purposes and that's it. Not make them billions of dollars level of usefulness.