this post was submitted on 29 Aug 2024
350 points (97.3% liked)

Canada

7106 readers
339 users here now

What's going on Canada?



Communities


🍁 Meta


πŸ—ΊοΈ Provinces / Territories


πŸ™οΈ Cities / Regions


πŸ’ SportsHockey

Football (NFL)

  • List of All Teams: unknown

Football (CFL)

  • List of All Teams: unknown

Baseball

Basketball

Soccer


πŸ’» Universities


πŸ’΅ Finance / Shopping


πŸ—£οΈ Politics


🍁 Social & Culture


Rules

Reminder that the rules for lemmy.ca also apply here. See the sidebar on the homepage:

https://lemmy.ca


founded 3 years ago
MODERATORS
 
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] sbv@sh.itjust.works 6 points 3 weeks ago (1 children)

Compared to most of the leadership alternatives, he was good. I appreciate that he didn't want to pander to the Poilievre base.

His overthrow was inevitable. In retrospect, at least.

[–] voluble@lemmy.ca 2 points 3 weeks ago (1 children)

TFW your election campaign was provably targeted by hostile foreign powers because your foreign policy positions are contrary to their aims and goals.

[–] sbv@sh.itjust.works 2 points 3 weeks ago (1 children)

That's definitely a thing too. I'm not sure it changes the trajectory of his career though.

If the PRC hadn't meddled, and O'Toole took the 10-ish ridings he alleged were subverted (which seems like a bit of a stretch), the Conservatives still wouldn't have been able to form government.

I think Poilievre's revolt did more to turf O'Toole than the PRC.

From what I've seen, Poilievre hasn't been nearly as hawkish on China, so the PRC certainly got lucky on that one.

[–] voluble@lemmy.ca 1 points 2 weeks ago

Fair. Though it's hard to say much about the extent and effect of interference in the 2021 federal election, because much of it is still not known by the public, and there is no plan for disclosure. O'Toole was briefed on matters that concerned him. All the public has gotten are vague claims that the interference "didn't change the outcome of the election". The notion that any citizen should find that reassuring is a chilling thought.

And from a cynic's point of view, it's arguable that Poilievre's willful blindness and mealymouthed stance on national security isn't simply a lucky outcome for foreign powers that seek to influence Canadian politics - it's a stance that could serve to materially benefit him and his party in a federal election where interference is expected.

And more generally, when choosing a leader, are Conservatives now primed to prefer weak Poilievre-type foreign policy, instead of stronger O'Toole-type foreign policy? Probably. That's a downstream effect and success of interference. It's bad news all around, and I don't think enough is made of the issue.