this post was submitted on 29 Aug 2024
722 points (99.3% liked)

A Boring Dystopia

9741 readers
763 users here now

Pictures, Videos, Articles showing just how boring it is to live in a dystopic society, or with signs of a dystopic society.

Rules (Subject to Change)

--Be a Decent Human Being

--Posting news articles: include the source name and exact title from article in your post title

--Posts must have something to do with the topic

--Zero tolerance for Racism/Sexism/Ableism/etc.

--No NSFW content

--Abide by the rules of lemmy.world

founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] Worx@lemmynsfw.com 2 points 2 months ago (4 children)

Why though, what did they do wrong? They're allowed to set their prices how they like as long as they're not coluding with competitors.

(I'm not saying it doesn't suck, obviously, but they are just doing a capitalism)

[–] SpaceNoodle@lemmy.world 6 points 2 months ago (2 children)

When you say "wrong," what do you mean? Are you arguing that their actions are morally just, or merely not too illegal?

[–] technocrit@lemmy.dbzer0.com 2 points 2 months ago* (last edited 2 months ago)

Capitalism violently forces people to serve capital for food, shelter, and other basic human needs.

This situation is slightly worse than usual.

[–] Worx@lemmynsfw.com 0 points 2 months ago (1 children)

I'm questioning whether they did anything illegal. It's quite obvious (to me, at least) that what they did is morally wrong

[–] SpaceNoodle@lemmy.world 4 points 2 months ago

"Wrong" is certainly the wrong word, then.

Price gouging does run counter to some states' consumer protection laws.

[–] beebarfbadger@lemmy.world 5 points 2 months ago

Were this capitalism, the competition would simply win by offering lower prices, but Kroger was allowed to grow to monopolistic proportions so that they've either bought up any and all serious competition already, muscled rivals out of business or settled on quasi-gerrymandered spheres of influence with their equally monopolistic competitors, so that nobody undercuts them when they abuse their status to not offer the best deals, but instead price-gouge the people stuck in their sphere of influence.

[–] theneverfox@pawb.social 1 points 2 months ago

First, I'd argue this was doing business in bad faith - they took advantage of a crisis to jack up profit on staple foods. That's extremely unethical

Second, they effectively did collude. McKinley is a consultant hired by Kroger (which owns many different regional chains) as well as their largest competitors and suppliers. They coordinated the price gouging - it doesn't matter if an algorithm does it or a third party does it, it's still collusion. Adding a degree of separation doesn't change the nature of the act

[–] Kalysta@lemm.ee 1 points 2 months ago

Price gouging is immoral and illegal in many states. Especially for needed things like food.

Saying this is fine is cheering for the poor to starve.