this post was submitted on 30 Aug 2024
49 points (78.2% liked)

politics

19072 readers
3868 users here now

Welcome to the discussion of US Politics!

Rules:

  1. Post only links to articles, Title must fairly describe link contents. If your title differs from the site’s, it should only be to add context or be more descriptive. Do not post entire articles in the body or in the comments.

Links must be to the original source, not an aggregator like Google Amp, MSN, or Yahoo.

Example:

  1. Articles must be relevant to politics. Links must be to quality and original content. Articles should be worth reading. Clickbait, stub articles, and rehosted or stolen content are not allowed. Check your source for Reliability and Bias here.
  2. Be civil, No violations of TOS. It’s OK to say the subject of an article is behaving like a (pejorative, pejorative). It’s NOT OK to say another USER is (pejorative). Strong language is fine, just not directed at other members. Engage in good-faith and with respect! This includes accusing another user of being a bot or paid actor. Trolling is uncivil and is grounds for removal and/or a community ban.
  3. No memes, trolling, or low-effort comments. Reposts, misinformation, off-topic, trolling, or offensive. Similarly, if you see posts along these lines, do not engage. Report them, block them, and live a happier life than they do. We see too many slapfights that boil down to "Mom! He's bugging me!" and "I'm not touching you!" Going forward, slapfights will result in removed comments and temp bans to cool off.
  4. Vote based on comment quality, not agreement. This community aims to foster discussion; please reward people for putting effort into articulating their viewpoint, even if you disagree with it.
  5. No hate speech, slurs, celebrating death, advocating violence, or abusive language. This will result in a ban. Usernames containing racist, or inappropriate slurs will be banned without warning

We ask that the users report any comment or post that violate the rules, to use critical thinking when reading, posting or commenting. Users that post off-topic spam, advocate violence, have multiple comments or posts removed, weaponize reports or violate the code of conduct will be banned.

All posts and comments will be reviewed on a case-by-case basis. This means that some content that violates the rules may be allowed, while other content that does not violate the rules may be removed. The moderators retain the right to remove any content and ban users.

That's all the rules!

Civic Links

Register To Vote

Citizenship Resource Center

Congressional Awards Program

Federal Government Agencies

Library of Congress Legislative Resources

The White House

U.S. House of Representatives

U.S. Senate

Partnered Communities:

News

World News

Business News

Political Discussion

Ask Politics

Military News

Global Politics

Moderate Politics

Progressive Politics

UK Politics

Canadian Politics

Australian Politics

New Zealand Politics

founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS
 

As this recently updated article discusses, while extremely unlikely, given the way this timeline is going it's possible the electoral college ends in a tie. Nate Silver projects this as a .3% possibility.

Things to think about:

  1. Only about half of the states require their electors to vote for the person that won their state. Who are the electors? Generally no one you know.

  2. If there's a tie, the House elects a president and the Senate elects a VP. Sub-consideration: it is the composition of the House and Senate after the November election that makes those determinations.

  3. This would all technically be decided on January 6th. And you remember how that went last time.

Regardless, it's highly unlikely this will happen. Still, this would be utter and complete madness. There is literally a non-zero chance we have a Trump/Harris administration. 🤣

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] jordanlund@lemmy.world 30 points 2 months ago (19 children)

It can't really be removed because it's part of the Constitution. That would take an amendment and the bar for doing that is just too high right now.

There is an alternate plan for states to just agree to cast their EC votes for whoever the national popular vote winner is, but that plan doesn't kick in until enough states agree that total to 270.

Currently sitting at 209:

https://www.nationalpopularvote.com/written-explanation

[–] reddig33@lemmy.world 10 points 2 months ago (5 children)

You never know until you try. I mean look at Republicans — they’ve been beating the anti-abortion drum since Phyllis Schlafly. And now abortion has been made illegal. Maybe the dems should at least start talking about it rather than just accepting defeat.

[–] jordanlund@lemmy.world 9 points 2 months ago* (last edited 2 months ago) (4 children)

An amendment starts with 290 votes in the House, a body who can't even get a simple 218 vote majority to decide who their own leader is. 290 is out of reach.

If, by some miracle, they get that, then it needs 67 votes in the Senate, a body blocked by a 60 vote filibuster requirement.

Assuming they somehow get both of those, it then goes to the states for ratification.

You need 38 states, and since the losers of the popular vote have all been Republicans, that means getting all 25 Biden states from 2020 + 13 Trump states.

Even then, the base of 25 states isn't guaranteed as only 19 of them have Democratic state houses. So now you may need as many as 19 Trump states?

So, yeah, an Amendment is not in the cards. Flip it around, let's say the Republicans want an amendmement to ban abortion nationwide... not going to happen.

[–] garpujol@discuss.online 4 points 2 months ago (2 children)

That schoolhouse rock song is playing in the background.

[–] jordanlund@lemmy.world 4 points 2 months ago

🎼🎶🎵🎶"In 1787 I'm told..."🎶🎵

https://youtu.be/RnVmIrAiQB8

[–] rebelsimile@sh.itjust.works 4 points 2 months ago (1 children)

he’s just gonna stay a bill with that attitude

[–] garpujol@discuss.online 3 points 2 months ago

Nah he’ll get passed. But somehow a bunch of other things will get tacked onto him and suddenly it’s not a voter bill but more military funding and corporate tax breaks.

load more comments (1 replies)
load more comments (1 replies)
load more comments (14 replies)