this post was submitted on 01 Sep 2024
482 points (82.3% liked)

memes

16255 readers
3688 users here now

Community rules

1. Be civilNo trolling, bigotry or other insulting / annoying behaviour

2. No politicsThis is non-politics community. For political memes please go to !politicalmemes@lemmy.world

3. No recent repostsCheck for reposts when posting a meme, you can only repost after 1 month

4. No botsNo bots without the express approval of the mods or the admins

5. No Spam/AdsNo advertisements or spam. This is an instance rule and the only way to live.

A collection of some classic Lemmy memes for your enjoyment

Sister communities

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
 

And unfortunately lemmy.ml is getting more online traffic recently.

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] awwwyissss@lemm.ee 82 points 10 months ago (36 children)

Lemmy.ml is run by people who spread authoritarian propaganda, most likely the CCP. It's a real stain on Lemmy and people shouldn't support or legitimize it in any way.

[–] SteveFromMySpace@lemmy.blahaj.zone 95 points 10 months ago (30 children)

most likely the CCP

Yeah you’re gonna need a source for that one. I don’t like ml but you can’t just throw that out there without evidence

[–] dohpaz42@lemmy.world 10 points 10 months ago* (last edited 10 months ago) (16 children)

Spend some time browsing through the instances communities.

It is well known that that both the main devs of Lemmy (whose home instance is Lemmy.ml) are ~~communists~~ socialists who side with the ideals of China (CCP). Also, it may be less known that the .ml is short for Marxist/Leninist or Marx/Lenin. Either way, it’s a hat tip to ~~communism~~ socialism.

They are known for being heavy-handed with post/comment removal and bans of opposing views of any kind. Viewing their mod log would attest to that.

[–] SteveFromMySpace@lemmy.blahaj.zone 36 points 10 months ago* (last edited 10 months ago) (2 children)

That’s is a lot of words to hand wave away a reasonable expectation as you say “do your own research.”

Stated without evidence dismissed without evidence, etc.

[–] Kalkaline@leminal.space 12 points 10 months ago (1 children)

It's really easy to demonstrate. Ask them for an alternative to Harris/Trump and they'll run around in circles to not give you a candidate and then tell you voting doesn't work.

[–] SteveFromMySpace@lemmy.blahaj.zone 16 points 10 months ago

A lot of people genuinely feel that way even if I think they’re wrong and it’s unproductive

[–] dohpaz42@lemmy.world 9 points 10 months ago (1 children)

I’d like to apologize that you felt my response was dismissive. I certainly did not intend to make anybody feel that way. I didn’t have any specific examples to give, so I approached it from an anecdotal point of view based on my personal experiences.

[–] SteveFromMySpace@lemmy.blahaj.zone 9 points 10 months ago (2 children)

I appreciate that and I could definitely do with less snark in my comments. That being said accusing the CCP of astroturfing lemmy instance at scale is a serious claim and it needs real evidence.

[–] dohpaz42@lemmy.world 6 points 10 months ago

If it means anything to you, my responses were not meant as accusations or attacks. Merely observations of the things I’ve personally seen. But I can appreciate your view of things, and I respect that you may disagree.

[–] Serinus@lemmy.world 3 points 10 months ago (1 children)

Does it matter who is doing it? Social media is rife with propaganda ever since r/the_donald was such a successful operation.

There are no volunteers that respond as quickly and consistently as r/t_d mods did. Anything counter to the narrative would be removed within seconds, at any time of day

[–] SteveFromMySpace@lemmy.blahaj.zone 1 points 10 months ago* (last edited 10 months ago)

The problem pre-dated the_donald and we aren’t debating if who is doing it matters/if it’s happening. You’re completely reframing this discussion into something I didn’t say and ignoring the initial claim I took issue with. It has nothing to do with the original discussion.

load more comments (13 replies)
load more comments (26 replies)
load more comments (31 replies)