this post was submitted on 19 Aug 2023
343 points (96.2% liked)

World News

38200 readers
3518 users here now

A community for discussing events around the World

Rules:

We ask that the users report any comment or post that violate the rules, to use critical thinking when reading, posting or commenting. Users that post off-topic spam, advocate violence, have multiple comments or posts removed, weaponize reports or violate the code of conduct will be banned.

All posts and comments will be reviewed on a case-by-case basis. This means that some content that violates the rules may be allowed, while other content that does not violate the rules may be removed. The moderators retain the right to remove any content and ban users.


Lemmy World Partners

News !news@lemmy.world

Politics !politics@lemmy.world

World Politics !globalpolitics@lemmy.world


Recommendations

For Firefox users, there is media bias / propaganda / fact check plugin.

https://addons.mozilla.org/en-US/firefox/addon/media-bias-fact-check/

founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS
 

KEY POINTS

  • 33-year-old Lucy Letby was convicted on Friday of killing seven babies in the neonatal unit of a hospital in England.

  • A handwritten note found by police officers who searched her home after the arrest read "I killed them on purpose".

  • Letby will be sentenced on Monday and faces a very long prison term, and possibly a rare full life sentence.

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] Shotgun_Alice@lemmy.world 7 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago) (2 children)

Wait I'm confused are there actually people who think she didn't do this? I looked at the evidence it's pretty f****** clear she killed like a bunch of babies. Like how much of a psychopath do you have to be to kill a baby not only a baby, preemies. The most defenseless of defenseless, like are you for real or are you just like joshing and having a laugh, are you for real?

[–] DDNB@lemmy.world 11 points 1 year ago (2 children)

Oh YOU looked at the evidence? Ok, nothing more to do here boys, time to shut down the courts and legal institutions, we found a much better way to do things. Why haven't we thought about contacting you sooner?

You think there is no deception possible in this world? Imagine you killed someone and afterwards it turns out a mistake was made in the process?

[–] Nythos@sh.itjust.works 0 points 1 year ago (1 children)

Dude what?

There’s a note in her handwriting admitting she did it.

All the babies that died, died whilst she was on shift at a infinitely higher rate than what was normal

The text messages on her phone link to the dates of when the babies were killed.

People can often be locked up or sentenced under some pretty circumstantial evidence, but that is not the case here.

[–] Urbanfox@lemmy.world 11 points 1 year ago (1 children)

It's not this specific case that suggests why killing prisoners is wrong, but others where it's not so cut and dry..

A man was recently pardoned after years in prison for a crime he did not commit - he was on a whole life sentence.

If killing someone for their crimes becomes legal, this man may have been killed for a crime he didn't commit and would never have seen a free day again.

By maintaing the system currently in place where we don't kill prisoners, there is the opportunities for miscarriages of justice to be somewhat rectified.

Can't bring a man back from the dead, but we can give him a million pounds for the false imprisonment and his freedom for the rest of his days.

[–] Shotgun_Alice@lemmy.world 2 points 1 year ago (1 children)

I never said she needs to be put to death or advocated for such, I just hope she never gets out so that she can harm another person. Anyway, I assumed they didn't have the death penalty in Britain.

[–] Urbanfox@lemmy.world 1 points 1 year ago (1 children)

My bad, I made an assumption based on the earlier stance in the thread of this woman getting the death penalty.