this post was submitted on 01 Sep 2024
482 points (82.3% liked)

memes

10206 readers
2359 users here now

Community rules

1. Be civilNo trolling, bigotry or other insulting / annoying behaviour

2. No politicsThis is non-politics community. For political memes please go to !politicalmemes@lemmy.world

3. No recent repostsCheck for reposts when posting a meme, you can only repost after 1 month

4. No botsNo bots without the express approval of the mods or the admins

5. No Spam/AdsNo advertisements or spam. This is an instance rule and the only way to live.

Sister communities

founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS
 

And unfortunately lemmy.ml is getting more online traffic recently.

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] dohpaz42@lemmy.world 9 points 2 months ago (4 children)

I’d like to apologize that you felt my response was dismissive. I certainly did not intend to make anybody feel that way. I didn’t have any specific examples to give, so I approached it from an anecdotal point of view based on my personal experiences.

[–] SteveFromMySpace@lemmy.blahaj.zone 9 points 2 months ago (3 children)

I appreciate that and I could definitely do with less snark in my comments. That being said accusing the CCP of astroturfing lemmy instance at scale is a serious claim and it needs real evidence.

[–] Serinus@lemmy.world 3 points 2 months ago (1 children)

Does it matter who is doing it? Social media is rife with propaganda ever since r/the_donald was such a successful operation.

There are no volunteers that respond as quickly and consistently as r/t_d mods did. Anything counter to the narrative would be removed within seconds, at any time of day

[–] SteveFromMySpace@lemmy.blahaj.zone 1 points 2 months ago* (last edited 2 months ago)

The problem pre-dated the_donald and we aren’t debating if who is doing it matters/if it’s happening. You’re completely reframing this discussion into something I didn’t say and ignoring the initial claim I took issue with. It has nothing to do with the original discussion.

load more comments (1 replies)
load more comments (1 replies)